What if the National Guard went “back to basics”?
Instead of roaming the country as a military force, it can return to its roots. It should focus on protecting communities, fighting disasters, and standing ready at home. This was how it was initially intended.
Regular Role of the National Guard
Traditionally, the National Guard is a reserve part of the U.S. Armed Forces with a dual state and federal mission. Its primary duties include:
- Disaster response: helping with hurricanes, floods, wildfires, tornadoes, and other natural disasters.
- Civil support: assisting with search and rescue, law enforcement support, and humanitarian aid.
- Community protection: maintaining order during emergencies like riots or public unrest (when activated by a governor).
- Military readiness: training to serve as backup for overseas missions if federally activated.
Current Use vs. Regular Use
In recent years, the Guard has been used much more often as a deployable military force nationwide and abroad. Instead of focusing mainly on disaster relief and state emergencies, units have often been:
- Sent overseas for long deployments (Iraq, Afghanistan, and other global missions).
- Deployed domestically for extended periods to reinforce border security.
- Called into action for large-scale protests or high-profile events (sometimes more as a security force than a disaster-relief one).
This “running about the country” role shows the impact of federal activation. It often overrides the state-level, community-first role the Guard was created for.
If They Were Not Used in This Way
If the Guard were not being tasked so heavily with nationwide or military-style deployments, they would be more focused on:
- Local readiness involves staying in their communities and training for natural disasters and emergency responses.
- Rapid-response teams: being first on the ground for wildfires, floods, and major storms.
- Community integration: building stronger ties with local emergency agencies, fire, police, and hospitals.
- Relief from strain: soldiers wouldn’t be stretched between frequent national missions and their civilian lives (jobs, families).
In short, without the current expanded use, the Guard would essentially serve as a state-based safety net. It would not work as a roaming military or quasi-police force.
Back to Basics: Rethinking the Role of the National Guard
The National Guard has long been the “citizen-soldier” force of the United States, built to serve both State and country. In recent decades, its role has changed. It has drifted toward functioning as a national military extension. It is constantly deployed across the country and overseas. What if, instead, the Guard returned to its roots?
1. Local First: Anchored in Communities
At its best, the Guard is a local safety net. Guardsmen live, work, and raise families in the same communities they serve. Units should primarily focus on state-based missions. This focus ensures the Guard would be ready to respond within hours to natural disasters. They would also be prepared for civil emergencies or infrastructure crises. Imagine a Guard that spends more time training with local fire departments, EMTs, and hospitals than on federal deployments.
2. Disaster Response as the Core Mission
Hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, wildfires—these are the events that disrupt American lives far more often than foreign conflict. A back-to-basics Guard would prioritize:
- Maintaining rapid-response disaster teams in every State.
- Stockpiling equipment is tailored for local threats. This includes boats in flood zones, fire suppression gear in the West, and snow mobility in the North.
- Conducting community disaster drills ensures that both citizens and Guardsmen are equally prepared.
Units would no longer be pulled away for distant missions. They would focus on being the first and best resource for emergencies at home.
3. Training for Peace, Not Just War
Right now, Guard training often mirrors active-duty military requirements, preparing for combat tours. In a reset model, training would also emphasize:
- Engineering & rebuilding skills (bridges, roads, communications).
- Medical readiness to help hospitals in crises.
- Cybersecurity units to defend state and municipal systems.
- Community relations, so Guardsmen stay trusted neighbors rather than distant enforcers.
This would shift the Guard’s culture back toward being helpers before fighters.
4. Federal Role: Truly Exceptional, Not Routine
Of course, the Guard must stay capable of federal service in extreme situations—war, national catastrophe, or extraordinary need. Yet, deployments abroad or cross-country should be rare exceptions, not the default. By limiting federalization, Guardsmen can balance their civilian careers and military service, reducing burnout and attrition.
5. Why It Matters
A back-to-basics Guard would mean fewer fatigued families. It would result in stronger ties to local communities. This approach ensures a quicker, more reliable response when disaster strikes. America’s Guard would not be stretched thin across the globe. It would once again stand where it was meant to: in the towns and states it calls home.
What if you read notices in your local news that read?
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION
Governor Announces New “Back to Basics” Model for the National Guard

Kansas, June 32, 1901 — Governor Sample, today, announced a renewed vision for the role of the National Guard. He prioritized disaster response, community protection, and local readiness. These take precedence over routine national or overseas deployments.
“For too long, our Guard has been stretched thin. They have been asked to serve as a roaming military force. Their greatest value lies right here at home,” said Governor Sample. “This back-to-basics approach ensures readiness. When disaster strikes—whether it’s a wildfire, flood, storm, or cyberattack—the Guard will be here for the people of Kansas.”
The new model emphasizes:
- Local Focus: Units stay in-state and train alongside fire, police, and emergency services.
- Disaster Response Core: Stockpiles of equipment tailored to regional needs (boats, fire suppression, snowmobiles).
- Civil Support: Enhanced training in medical aid, engineering, and cybersecurity.
- Federal Deployment Limits: Guard units will be reserved for exceptional national missions, not routine overseas tours.
“Our citizen-soldiers are not only protectors—they are neighbors, coworkers, and family members,” The Governor added.
“By keeping them rooted in our communities, we strengthen both readiness and trust.”
The announcement received praise from emergency officials. Guard families also praised it. They say the plan reduces the strain on soldiers. These soldiers balance military duties with civilian life.
“This will make the Guard what it was always meant to be—a safety net for the people. It was not meant to be a shadow army,” said Major General Example, Adjutant General of the Kansas National Guard.
- OR –
National Guard to Refocus on Community, Disaster Relief Under New State Plan
Pingpong, CA. Feb.30th, 1901 — The National Guard in California will soon change their focus. They will be trading extended deployments and national security missions for a renewed focus closer to home. In a press conference yesterday, Governor Pixel outlined a “back-to-basics” approach. This approach emphasizes disaster response, community support, and local readiness as the Guard’s primary mission.
The plan follows many years of frequent Guard call-ups across the country. These call-ups range from border security and protest response to overseas rotations. Critics have long argued these duties stretch citizen-soldiers too thin, pulling them away from their families, jobs, and communities.
Under the new model, Guard units would focus on in-state needs, like wildfire suppression, flood response, and medical assistance. Specialized equipment would be stockpiled based on regional threats. Training would shift toward engineering, emergency medicine, and cybersecurity. The focus would be less on combat deployments. Federal missions wouldn’t disappear, but would be reserved for “extraordinary circumstances.”
“This change will transform the Guard. It will achieve its true purpose,” said Major General Mission, Adjutant General of the California National Guard. “It will become a force that’s ready to protect and serve right where its soldiers live.”
Community leaders praised the proposal, noting the Guard’s quick local response during past disasters. Families of Guardsmen also welcomed the change, saying the plan reduces the strain of juggling civilian and military life.
The proposal has yet to be tested. It signals a shift in priorities. The Guard is rooted not in constant deployments. Its foundation lies in its mission as a local safety net for the people of California.
Returning the Guard to its original purpose –
📌 Top 3 Changes in the Guard’s Role
1. Local First
Guard units will stay primarily in-state, training with fire, police, and emergency services for quicker disaster response.
2. Disaster Response Core
Specialized equipment stockpiles—boats, wildfire gear, snowmobiles—tailored to each region will be prioritized over combat readiness.
3. Federal Deployment Limits
Units will only be sent on national or overseas missions for extraordinary emergencies, not as a routine practice.
That day will probably never come for a great many who read this report. For others who do, it serves as a goal. It becomes something to aim for when trying to look to a brighter future.
By Benjamin GroffMedia© | benandsteve.com | 2025


