Former Oklahoma City Acting Mayor Guy Liebmann Dies at 90

June 10, 2026June 11, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures

June 10th, 2026

Former Oklahoma Acting Mayor Had Grit, And Determination. A Marine. A State Lawmaker. And A Family Man.

——–

Public Servant Helped Guide Oklahoma City Through a Time of Transition

Local news media in Oklahoma appears to have ignored the former city council member and acting mayor service.

Former Oklahoma City Mayor and Oklahoma State Representative Guy Hoyt Liebmann has passed away at the age of 90.

According to comments posted by citizens following his passing, concerns have been raised that local Oklahoma news media largely overlooked the public service of former Oklahoma City Council member and Acting Mayor Guy Liebmann.

Groff Media reviewed coverage from Oklahoma City’s three major television news outlets—News 9, KOCO 5, and KFOR—as well as Oklahoma’s largest newspaper, The Oklahoman. Aside from a death notice appearing in paid obituary advertising space, we found little or no reporting recognizing Liebmann’s years of service to Oklahoma City and the State of Oklahoma.

Whether this reflects changing news priorities or simply an oversight, it has prompted some residents to question why a public servant who devoted decades to civic leadership received so little attention from the institutions that regularly document the history of the community he served.

Unlike that situation. Groff Media will recognize the individual.

Liebmann died on June 8, 2026, leaving behind a legacy of public service that stretched from the Oklahoma City Council to the Oklahoma House of Representatives and included a brief but significant period as Oklahoma City’s acting mayor.

Born in Shawnee on April 27, 1936, Liebmann graduated from Oklahoma City’s Classen High School before earning a degree in business management from the University of Oklahoma. He later served as an officer in the United States Marine Corps before entering a successful career in real estate and investments.

Many Oklahomans may remember Liebmann best for his service on the Oklahoma City Council representing Ward 8. In November 2003, following the resignation of Mayor Kirk Humphreys, Liebmann was appointed acting mayor and guided the city until voters elected Mick Cornett in March 2004.

Though his time as mayor lasted only a few months, it came during an important chapter in Oklahoma City’s development. The city was continuing its transformation into a nationally recognized metropolitan area, and Liebmann helped provide stability during a period of leadership transition.

During his service on the council and as acting mayor, Liebmann worked with several important city organizations, including the Oklahoma City Water Trust, the Convention and Visitors Bureau, and the Oklahoma City Fairgrounds Trust.

After leaving City Hall, Liebmann continued his public service by representing House District 82 in the Oklahoma House of Representatives from 2005 through 2013.

His public career reflected a belief that local government matters. While many political careers are measured by headlines and controversy, Liebmann’s legacy was built largely through committee work, civic involvement, and a willingness to serve when called upon.

Today, Oklahoma City residents drive roads, utilize services, and enjoy civic improvements that were influenced by the efforts of countless local officials whose names rarely appear in history books. Guy Liebmann was one of those individuals.

As news of his passing spreads, Oklahomans have an opportunity to remember a generation of civic leaders who dedicated years of their lives to public service, often with little recognition beyond the communities they served.

Funeral arrangements have been entrusted to Smith & Kernke Funeral Directors in Oklahoma City. At the time of publication, the funeral home reported that memorial service details were still pending and would be announced when finalized.

Guy Liebmann was 90 years old.

Funeral services and memorial information can be found here.

Benjamin Groff II
Groff Media © Truth Endures
Today We Remember

When Presidents Disappear From View – This Isn’t The Truman Years Anymore

June 9, 2026June 5, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

June 9, 2026

Presidential Visibility in the Age of Social Media

For most of American history, citizens rarely knew where their president was every hour of every day. News traveled at the speed of newspapers, radio broadcasts, and evening television reports. A president could spend days away from public view without generating much notice.

How long out of sight can a President go without their public raising concern? — Missing – “The President of The United States”

Today, that has changed.

In the age of social media, twenty-four-hour news cycles, and instant communication, even a few days without a public appearance can spark speculation. Questions emerge. Rumors spread. Conspiracy theories flourish.

That is exactly what happened recently when President Donald Trump was absent from public view for several days.

The speculation raises a larger question that extends beyond any one president: How much visibility do Americans expect from their leaders, and has that expectation changed with technology?

The discussion becomes even more relevant as America continues electing leaders well into their seventies and eighties. President Trump is approaching 80 years of age. Former President Joe Biden served into his eighties. Other national leaders around the world have governed well beyond what was once considered traditional retirement age.

Age alone does not determine a person’s ability to lead. History is filled with examples of individuals who remained productive, sharp, and influential well into their later years. At the same time, age naturally invites questions about health, stamina, and transparency—questions that would be asked of anyone occupying one of the most demanding jobs on Earth.

Perhaps the real story is not where a president was for a week.

Perhaps the story is how quickly Americans become concerned when they cannot see their president, hear from their president, or receive reassurance that the nation’s business is continuing as usual.

In a nation connected by smartphones, social media feeds, and constant news alerts, visibility has become a form of leadership all its own.

The question for the future may not be whether presidents can work behind closed doors.

It may be whether the American public is still willing to believe they are working when the cameras are turned off.

The Question That Stopped the Debate

June 5, 2026June 4, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

June 5, 2026

Regardless of political party, every voter should be able to answer one simple question: What has gotten better?

The War Dept. is the only one getting increased funding it seems…

Political debates often generate more heat than light. The participants trade statistics, accusations, and talking points while supporters on each side declare victory before the discussion has even ended. Most of the time, the debate itself is quickly forgotten.

But every once in a while, a simple question emerges that cuts through all the noise.

Recently, during a political exchange, one participant was asked a question that should have been easy to answer:

“What has gotten better?”

Not what might get better.

Not what the other side did wrong.

Not what could happen in the future.

What has actually improved?

The question seemed simple enough. Yet, like many simple questions, it carried unexpected weight.

As I watched the discussion unfold, I found myself less interested in the person being questioned and more interested in the question itself. In fact, I began wondering how many Americans—Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Libertarians, or those who avoid political labels altogether—could clearly answer it.

If you support a politician, what has improved because of that support?

If you oppose a politician, what has become worse?

Could you explain it without repeating a slogan?

Could you explain it without quoting social media?

Could you explain it using your own experiences and observations?

Those are harder questions than many of us would like to admit.

For generations, Americans have debated politics around dinner tables, barber shops, church gatherings, union halls, coffee shops, and family reunions. People disagreed then just as they do now. The difference was that many people could explain why they believed what they believed.

Today, we live in a world flooded with information. We have more access to news, opinions, podcasts, videos, and commentary than any generation in history. Yet, despite this abundance of information, meaningful conversations often seem more difficult than ever.

Too often, political discussions become competitions rather than conversations.

Instead of asking questions, we choose sides.

Instead of seeking understanding, we seek confirmation.

Instead of listening, we wait for our turn to speak.

The result is a nation where many people can repeat what they have heard but struggle to explain why they believe it.

That is not a criticism aimed at one party or one ideology. It is a challenge for all of us.

A healthy democracy depends upon informed citizens. It requires people who can think independently, evaluate evidence, question assumptions, and explain their reasoning. It requires citizens who are willing to admit when they do not know something and willing to reconsider their views when new information emerges.

Most importantly, it requires people who can answer simple questions honestly.

What has improved?

What has declined?

What evidence supports your conclusion?

Whether your answers point toward progress or concern is less important than your ability to explain them thoughtfully.

The future of our republic may depend less on who wins the next election and more on whether citizens can still engage in meaningful discussion about the issues that affect their lives.

The next time politics enters the conversation, perhaps we should pause before reciting a talking point and ask ourselves a simple question:

What has gotten better?

And perhaps an even more important one:

Can Americans Still Explain Why They Support Their Political Beliefs?

Benjamin Groff On The State of The Nation

June 2, 2026June 3, 2026Benjamin3 Comments

I wanted to present this piece in my own voice. It is my effort to enter the conversation with greater emphasis and a more personal connection to the subject, hoping to give added meaning to the events we are facing today. The full written text of my remarks is included as well.

© Benjamin H. Groff II — Truth Endures / benandsteve.com

June 2, 2026

IF I WERE A TYRANT

Hate, Anger and Discontent, the new American way! — Never Compromise! The New American Way…

BENJAMIN GROFF II

IF I WERE A TYRANT

If I were a tyrant determined to weaken the Republic of the United States, I would not begin with tanks in the streets or soldiers at the door. No… history shows that nations are rarely surrendered all at once. They are usually persuaded to surrender themselves a little at a time.

First, I would attack confidence. Not confidence in me — confidence in one another.

I would begin by tearing away at the nation’s heroes. I would revisit every flaw, every mistake, every rumor from the past, and present them not as human failings, but as proof that nothing honorable had ever existed at all. Sheriffs, presidents, governors, military leaders, teachers, even ministers — I would insist they were never worthy of admiration in the first place.

I would convince people that patriotism was foolishness, that pride in country was embarrassment, and that respect for institutions was a sign of weakness.

Then I would flood the public square with noise.

Not one story — thousands of them.

Some true. Some half true. Some entirely manufactured. I would spread them across television, social media, podcasts, websites, and endless comment sections until the average citizen no longer knew what was real and what was fiction. Repetition would do the heavy lifting. After hearing something enough times, people begin mistaking familiarity for truth.

And once confusion took hold, I would encourage Americans to distrust every source of information except the ones loyal to my cause.

I would tell them the newspapers were lying.
The courts were corrupt.
The elections were rigged.
The scientists were compromised.
The teachers were indoctrinating.
The police were enemies.
The judges were bought.
And eventually, even neighbors would begin suspecting neighbors.

Division would become the national pastime.

I would not need brilliant leaders to carry out my plan. In fact, charisma without discipline would serve me better. I would elevate loud voices over wise ones. I would reward outrage instead of integrity. I would discover ambitious people lacking moral restraint — people willing to say anything, accuse anyone, or inflame any fear if it kept them powerful and profitable.

Money and attention can persuade some people to abandon principles they never truly possessed.

Then I would encourage the population to separate itself into tribes. Not Americans first — but factions first. Race against race. Rural against urban. Conservative against liberal. Young against old. Citizen against immigrant. I would make every disagreement feel permanent and unforgivable.

Because a divided people are easier to control than a united one.

And finally — perhaps most importantly — I would convince ordinary citizens that freedom itself was the problem. That liberty was dangerous. That dissent was threatening. That opposing voices should be silenced instead of debated.

At that point, I would hardly need to overthrow the Republic.

The people, exhausted, angry, suspicious, and fearful, would begin surrendering it willingly — believing all the while they were saving it.

History has shown that democracies rarely disappear with the sound of drums and marching boots. More often, they fade beneath the applause of crowds convinced they are doing what is necessary.

And the most dangerous tyrant of all?

The one who convinces people they are still free while teaching them to hate one another.

benandsteve.com Wrote It as Satire. Then 150 Cherry Trees Came Down! Ooops –––

May 24, 2026May 24, 2026Benjamin1 Comment

Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures

May 24th, 2026

What began on April 1, 2026, as an April Fools satire on benandsteve.com about the removal of Washington D.C.’s famous cherry trees has taken on an ironic twist worthy of the times themselves. From our perch in Arizona, where benandsteve.com now operates, we imagined what many would consider unthinkable: the federal government removing the beloved cherry trees surrounding the nation’s capital. The story was written purely in the spirit of April Fools humor. After all, the last time our reporting came directly from Washington D.C. was back in 2015, and frankly, we had little desire to return.

Then came the response.

A reader challenged the story as being false. We could hardly argue otherwise — it was intended as satire. But the comment included something unexpected: a claim that the National Park Service was actually removing cherry trees as part of a seawall reconstruction project around the Tidal Basin. Curious, we checked.

The unbelievable part? The reader was right. Thanks to them we checked who ordered it.

Trump is pissed over Cherry bloom in his hair — Blooms falling in wrong persons hair, proves deadly for cherry trees in D.C.

The current occupant of the White House has reportedly expressed frustration over the nation originally receiving the cherry trees as a gift from Japan — a detail aides say had to be explained to him once again during a recent briefing. According to the tongue-in-cheek chatter now circulating through political rumor mills and late-night conversations, the irritation supposedly intensified after a television news segment showed cherry blossoms caught in the President’s hair during a windy appearance near the Tidal Basin. Unfortunately for staff, reports claim several top aides were also seen wearing the pink evidence of spring across their jackets and hairlines, triggering laughter from commentators and little sympathy inside the administration.

Whether fact, fiction, or simply Washington being Washington, the story has now taken on a life of its own.

In reality, trees connected to the historic Japanese gift presented to the United States in the early 1900s are being removed as part of a massive infrastructure effort designed to repair and reinforce the aging seawall surrounding the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C.. Reports indicate approximately 150 cherry trees have already been removed or are slated for removal during the project.

Sometimes satire collides with reality in the strangest ways imaginable. What was intended as an outrageous fictional jab at modern government decision-making suddenly found itself standing shoulder-to-shoulder with actual events. In an era where truth often feels stranger than fiction, even an April Fools joke can accidentally wander into the headlines.

George Washington never cut down a cherry tree. Meanwhile, history will show 150+ will have been cut down by the Trump Administration.

CBS Television: Slowly Dimming the Lights on a Broadcasting Legacy

May 23, 2026May 23, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures

May 23, 2026

The Lights Are Fading at CBS Television

For years, programs like the television series FBI, NCIS, and Elsbeth built loyal audiences by offering dependable storytelling and familiar characters. Recently, however, some longtime viewers have expressed frustration not necessarily with the shows themselves, but with broader concerns surrounding the direction and management of CBS and CBS News.

CBS News evening news ratings have struggled in 2026. Reports indicate the network’s nightly news audience has remained well behind competitors at ABC and NBC, with several weeks falling below 4 million viewers.
Industry analysts have noted that some CBS entertainment programs are seeing softer live ratings compared to prior seasons, especially among traditional broadcast audiences. Elsbeth has been described by ratings analysts as one of CBS’s weaker live-viewed scripted programs, relying more heavily on delayed streaming audiences.
While flagship franchises like NCIS and FBI remain successful enough to receive renewals, overall network dominance has weakened. Industry reports suggest NBC may surpass CBS in total seasonal broadcast viewers for the first time in over a decade.
Online viewer commentary increasingly reflects frustration with corporate leadership decisions at CBS and Paramount rather than criticism of the actors or writing themselves. Viewer comments attached to ratings articles frequently mention distrust or dissatisfaction with network management decisions influencing their viewing habits.

Among certain audiences, that dissatisfaction appears to be spilling over into entertainment programming, with some viewers choosing to step away from the network altogether. Whether fair or not, perception matters in television, and public trust in a network can influence how audiences respond to its scripted content.

Shows like NCIS, FBI, and Elsbeth still deliver solid performances and experienced casts, but there is growing evidence that audience frustration with the direction of CBS and CBS News is beginning to affect viewer loyalty across the network. Ratings reports show CBS losing ground in several key areas, while online discussion increasingly centers on dissatisfaction with management decisions rather than the shows themselves. Whether temporary or long-term, the network appears to be facing a growing disconnect with part of its traditional audience.

The casts and production teams behind these programs continue delivering polished work, but viewer impressions of corporate leadership and news operations are increasingly becoming part of the conversation surrounding the network’s prime-time lineup.

Viewers continue to drift away, switching off the network in search of outlets they believe are more trustworthy and reliable. For many longtime television audiences, the situation feels like the fading of a legacy once defined by credibility and journalistic strength. One can only imagine pioneers like Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow looking on with disappointment at what many viewers believe CBS has become

Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures

Farewell & Remembrance – Barney Frank

May 20, 2026May 20, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

May 20, 2026

_{^{Image – Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures}}

Barney Frank

1940 – 2025

Public Servant. Trailblazer. Champion. Icon.

Former Congressman Barney Frank has died. Reports indicate that Frank entered hospice care at his home in Ogunquit, Maine, while battling congestive heart failure. According to the Associated Press.

Frank died late Tuesday, according to Jim Segel, Frank’s former campaign manager and close friend.

“Former Congressman Barney Frank, one of the most recognizable and influential openly gay lawmakers in American history, spent his final days in hospice care at his home in Ogunquit, Maine. The longtime Massachusetts representative, known for his sharp wit, fierce advocacy, and groundbreaking role in LGBTQI representation in Congress, had been battling congestive heart failure. As supporters, friends, and admirers reflect on his legacy, many are honoring a public servant whose voice helped reshape conversations about equality, civil rights, and representation in America.”

Barney Frank was many things to many people: a fierce advocate, a sharp intellect, a political force, and a voice that could cut through the noise with clarity and conviction. But above all, he was a champion for fairness, equality, and the rights of those too often left on the margins.

As one of the first openly gay members of Congress, Barney Frank broke barriers with unapologetic authenticity. He did not merely open doors for others — he helped tear them down. From fighting for LGBTQI rights to shaping major financial reform through the Dodd-Frank legislation, his impact on the nation remains undeniable.

Barney possessed a wit that could disarm opponents, a mind capable of dissecting the most complex issues, and a determination that never stopped pushing for what he believed was right. His public service helped redefine what representation looked like in America and inspired generations who once believed they had no place in government, leadership, or public life.

For countless members of the LGBTQI community, Barney Frank stood as proof that courage and honesty could change history. He understood the weight of silence, and he refused to live within it. In doing so, he became not just a lawmaker, but a symbol of progress and perseverance.

“Equality is not a special interest. It is a human right.”
— Barney Frank

Today we remember a man who helped shape modern America through intelligence, humor, resilience, and conviction. His voice may now be silent, but the legacy he leaves behind continues to echo through every conversation about equality, dignity, and justice.

Thank you, Barney.
You recorded history.
You changed it.
And you will be remembered.

Rest in Power.

When Crime Happens: What Every Citizen Should Know About Becoming a Victim

May 18, 2026Benjamin1 Comment

May 18th, 2026

__________________________________________________________________

It is hoped you will never become the victim of a crime. No person leaves home expecting their vehicle to be burglarized, their property stolen, or their sense of security shattered in a matter of moments. Yet every day, across cities, towns, suburbs, and rural communities, ordinary people suddenly find themselves dealing with the emotional shock and confusion that follows criminal victimization.

One of the most important things a person can remember is this: your safety comes first.

Property can be replaced. Lives cannot.

Law enforcement officers have long stressed that victims often unintentionally place themselves in additional danger after discovering a crime has occurred. Some rush into burglarized homes. Others attempt to confront suspects. Some unknowingly destroy evidence while trying to clean up the scene or assess damage.

Those first few minutes matter.

Why Summer Months Often Bring More Victimization

Historically, criminal justice researchers and law enforcement agencies have observed increases in certain types of crime during warmer months. The reason is not simply heat or weather itself. It is human activity.

During summer, society becomes more socially active.

People travel more. Families vacation. Teenagers stay out later. Festivals, concerts, sporting events, and gatherings increase. Parks, lakes, malls, restaurants, and entertainment districts become crowded. Homes sit empty while families travel. Vehicles are left unattended for longer periods.

Unfortunately, criminals notice opportunity.

The more interaction and movement that occurs within a community, the greater the chance for:

vehicle burglaries,
thefts,
assaults,
robberies,
fraud,
vandalism,
road rage incidents,
and alcohol-related confrontations.

This does not mean people should fear enjoying life. It simply means awareness becomes more important during periods of increased activity.

Criminals often look for distractions, vulnerabilities, and easy opportunities. A locked car, a well-lit home, alert neighbors, and cautious behavior can sometimes be enough to make a criminal move on to an easier target.

What To Do If You Discover A Crime

If you discover you have become the victim of a crime, remember these important steps:

1. Put Your Safety First

If you believe a suspect could still be nearby, leave the area immediately if possible. Do not attempt to confront or chase someone unless absolutely necessary to protect life.

Many offenders are unpredictable, desperate, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

2. Do Not Touch Anything

Avoid touching doors, windows, drawers, vehicles, or objects the suspect may have handled. Fingerprints, DNA, shoe impressions, and other evidence can easily be destroyed.

Even straightening up the scene before police arrive can unintentionally damage evidence investigators need.

3. Do Not Enter A Burglarized Home, Building, Or Vehicle

If you notice an open door, broken window, damaged lock, or signs of forced entry, do not go inside.

The suspect may still be there.

Move to a safe location and contact law enforcement immediately.

4. Call 911 Or The Non-Emergency Number

Call 911 if:

the crime is in progress,
someone may be injured,
the suspect could still be nearby,
or immediate danger exists.

Use the non-emergency number if the crime already occurred and there is no active threat.

Try to provide:

your location,
what happened,
suspect descriptions,
vehicle descriptions,
direction of travel,
and whether weapons were involved.

5. Stay Nearby — But At A Safe Distance

Remain where officers can locate you, but avoid standing directly inside or near the scene.

If possible, position yourself where you can observe entrances or exits without placing yourself at risk.

6. Allow Officers To Secure The Scene

When officers arrive, avoid rushing toward them. Police responding to a crime scene do not immediately know who is involved or whether danger still exists.

Allow officers to approach and follow their instructions carefully.

7. Do Not Re-Enter Until Police Say It Is Safe

Even if you want to check for damage or missing items, wait until officers clear the scene.

Investigators may still be searching for suspects or processing evidence.

8. Write Down What You Remember

Memory fades quickly after stressful events.

As soon as possible, write down:

suspect descriptions,
clothing,
tattoos,
vehicle information,
statements made,
times,
sounds,
or anything unusual you noticed.

Small details often become major breaks in investigations.

9. Preserve Digital Evidence

Do not delete:

security camera footage,
doorbell camera recordings,
text messages,
threatening social media posts,
or cellphone video.

Inform investigators those items exist.

10. Understand Your Rights As A Victim

Some victims hesitate to cooperate because they fear retaliation or becoming publicly involved.

If you are afraid, tell officers or investigators immediately.

Victims in many states may qualify for:

victim advocacy services,
protective orders,
confidentiality protections,
counseling resources,
and notification services during court proceedings.

11. Cooperation Matters

In many cases, especially assaults, thefts, harassment, or domestic incidents, victim cooperation plays a critical role in whether charges move forward.

If victims decide not to prosecute or participate, investigators may have limited ability to continue the case unless strong independent evidence exists.

That decision is personal, but victims should understand their rights and options before making it.

Awareness Is One Of The Best Protections

No community is completely immune from crime. Rural towns, suburbs, and large cities alike all experience moments where ordinary people suddenly become victims.

But awareness, caution, and preparation remain powerful tools.

Lock vehicles. Secure homes. Stay alert in crowded areas. Watch out for neighbors. Report suspicious activity. Trust your instincts when something feels wrong.

Most importantly, never place property above personal safety.

A stolen television can be replaced.

A life cannot.

For benandsteve.com
Truth Endures.

Viral “Human Jerky” Story Making the Rounds Again — But It’s Fiction, Not Fact

May 16, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

Regardless, You May Never Eat Beef Jerky With The Same Satisfaction Again.

May 16, 2026

Internet Claim: Man Used Missing Men’s Bodies To Make Famous Beef Jerky

Local authorities arrested Buckworth on suspicion of using human meat for the jerky he sold to the public, and police needed to find the source of the meat.

A grotesque story now circulating again on Facebook, TikTok, and other social media platforms claims a man from Wenatchee was arrested after investigators supposedly discovered his “best-selling jerky” was made from human meat. The post names a man called “Ross Buckworth,” claims missing workers were connected to the case, and attempts to present itself as a real criminal investigation.

There is just one problem.

None of it is true.

The story is a recycled internet hoax that has been reposted for years in slightly different versions. In some versions the suspect is named “Ross Buckworth.” In others, “Leslie Buckworth.” Sometimes the story claims the events happened in Washington state. Other times it says Montana. The details change because the story itself is fabricated.

Fact-checking organizations previously traced earlier versions of the same claim to satire and fake-news style websites. Snopes labeled one widely shared version as satire. Another debunk pointed directly to a satirical source site that openly described itself as a humor publication.

What appears to have confused many readers is that the hoax borrows pieces from a real Wyoming wildlife-poaching case involving illegal jerky sales. In that legitimate case, Wyoming investigators discovered a man had been selling jerky made from poached mule deer and antelope while marketing it as beef jerky. DNA testing confirmed the meat came from illegally killed wildlife — not humans.

The actual Wyoming case involved wildlife violations investigated by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Authorities charged the suspect with poaching-related crimes, illegal sale of game meat, and hunting violations. No accusations involving human remains or cannibalism were ever part of the case.

That real story appears to have been twisted into sensational clickbait.

The viral post also shows several classic signs of internet fabrication:

No legitimate law enforcement agency confirms the arrest.
No credible newspaper or television outlet reported the story.
The alleged suspect cannot be verified through official records.
The details change depending on who reposts it.
The story uses shock value designed to trigger emotional reactions and sharing.

This is how many social media hoaxes survive. They blend one small piece of reality with outrageous fiction, then rely on people sharing before checking the facts.

In today’s online environment, shocking stories spread faster than verified information. The more disturbing the claim, the more engagement it receives. Algorithms reward outrage, fear, and disgust because people react emotionally before they pause to ask whether something is actually true.

That is exactly why stories like this continue to resurface every few years.

The “human jerky” story is not a hidden crime finally exposed to the public.

It is internet folklore dressed up as breaking news. And on this occasion, if you happen to see the story floating around Facebook, TikTok, or anywhere else online, you have the official blessing of benandsteve.com and GroffMedia©2026 — Truth Endures — to politely inform whoever is posting it that it is, without question, truly FAKE NEWS!

Reestablishing Editorial Standards: GroffMedia’s Collaborative Efforts

May 10, 2026Benjamin1 Comment

We are currently considering a return to Flipboard Media and the possible return of content services to and from GroffMedia, benandsteve.com, 2026 TruthEndures©. The proposal is under consideration.

May 10, 2026

benandsteve.com is currently considering returning to Flipboard Media, the possible return of content services to and from GroffMedia, benandsteve.com, 2026 TruthEndures©. As stated the proposal is under consideration.

Any return arrangement would require full editorial oversight and content review authority regarding material published under the name of Benjamin Groff, GroffMedia, benandsteve.com, or any affiliated entity. The purpose behind this requirement is rooted in a growing concern over balance, accountability, and fairness in modern media reporting.

Boardroom meeting with executives and CEO discussing stalled merger news

GroffMedia’s position is that journalism should reflect principles similar to the equal broadcast standards that existed prior to their dismantling during the Reagan era in the 1980s. While modern media has evolved, we believe there remains value in restoring elements of balanced reporting — ensuring that opposing viewpoints, facts, and perspectives receive meaningful and proportional representation.

Under this approach, articles submitted for publication would be expected to demonstrate reasonable efforts toward balanced coverage. That would include presenting both supporting and opposing perspectives with equal seriousness in research, interviews, reporting effort, and editorial consideration. The goal is not censorship or restriction of opinion, but rather a commitment to responsible journalism that informs rather than inflames.

One of the largest challenges facing such an effort is determining how these standards could be maintained among the many contributors who submit material through platforms such as Flipboard. Equally important is the process of selecting content that remains timely, relevant, beneficial to readers, and consistent with the editorial principles GroffMedia seeks to uphold.

At its core, the discussion is not simply about publishing content. It is about whether modern independent media can still create an environment where fairness, depth, and accountability are valued alongside speed and public engagement.

A major question at this stage is how to ensure that contributors submitting material for consideration consistently meet these editorial standards. One approach currently being explored is the development of a national grading or evaluation system designed to identify organizations, research groups, journalism institutions, and independent sources that demonstrate strong commitments to accuracy, balance, transparency, and accountability in reporting.

The challenge is not simply identifying who publishes the most content, but determining which organizations consistently apply equal effort to fact gathering, source verification, opposing viewpoints, corrections, and editorial integrity. Any standards adopted would need to measure credibility and fairness rather than ideology or political preference.

As this effort develops, GroffMedia hopes to identify trusted resources and partnerships capable of helping guide this mission in a meaningful and measurable way. If the project moves forward as intended, additional information regarding participating organizations, evaluation methods, and publication guidelines will be made available in the near future.

If Flipboard content does return, it will be under the understanding that only providers meeting those editorial standards will be eligible for posting to affiliated accounts. One of the concerns currently under review is whether such oversight can realistically be maintained without becoming excessively time-consuming or difficult to manage.

Among the ideas being considered is limiting reposted material to news organizations and media outlets that rank above a determined threshold within a recognized national grading or credibility system. Whether that approach can provide the balance, fairness, and consistency intended remains part of the ongoing evaluation process involving accounts associated with benandsteve.com and GroffMedia.

Paid to Spy: When Infiltrating a Group Is Legal… and When It Isn’t

April 21, 2026May 6, 2026Benjamin1 Comment

April 21, 2026

There’s a question that sounds simple on the surface, but carries a lot of weight underneath it:

Is it illegal to pay someone to infiltrate a group?

The answer isn’t a clean yes or no.

WASHINGTON — The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted Tuesday April 21st, 2026 on federal fraud charges alleging it improperly raised millions of dollars to pay informants to infiltrate the Ku Klux Klan and other extremist groups, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said.

The Justice Department alleges the civil rights group defrauded donors by using their money to fund the very extremism it claimed to be fighting, with payments of at least $3 million between 2014 and 2023 to people affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, the National Socialist Party of America and other extremist groups.

“The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred,” Blanche said.

You can read NPR’s Article Here.

The question many are asking is who is at fault, and is there a crime being committed? I took time to consider the law and what it had to say on the matter. This is what I found.

~~~ ~~~ ~~~
It depends on who is paying, why they’re doing it, and what happens once the infiltrator is inside.

Let’s strip it down to something plain and understandable.

The Part Most People Don’t Realize: It Happens All the Time

Law enforcement does this regularly.

Police departments and federal agencies pay:

Informants
Undercover officers
Cooperating witnesses

They send people into criminal organizations to gather information, build cases, and prevent crimes.

That part? Completely legal.

But There’s a Line—and It Matters

The law draws a very clear boundary.

Authorities are allowed to:

Watch
Listen
Document
Blend in

What they are not allowed to do is create the crime themselves.

That’s where a concept called entrapment comes in.

A Real Case That Defines the Line

In Jacobson v. United States, the government spent over two years trying to convince a man to commit a crime.

They didn’t just observe him—they pushed him.

They sent repeated messages.
They applied pressure.
They nudged him toward a decision he hadn’t made on his own.

Eventually, he gave in.

The Supreme Court stepped in and said: That’s not justice—that’s manufacturing a crime.

The conviction was overturned.

The Rule in Plain English

Here it is, as simple as it gets:

Legal: Infiltrating a group that is already doing something illegal
Illegal: Pushing someone to commit a crime they weren’t already going to commit

That’s the dividing line.

What About Private Citizens?

This is where things get more dangerous—and more likely illegal.

If a private individual or organization pays someone to infiltrate a group, problems can stack up quickly:

Lying to gain access can become fraud
Recording people can violate privacy laws
Gathering information can cross into harassment or surveillance
Encouraging wrongdoing can turn into conspiracy

In short:
What law enforcement can legally do under rules and oversight, private individuals usually cannot.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

We live in a time where people are suspicious.
Of institutions.
Of politics.
Of each other.

Stories about infiltration—real or imagined—spread quickly because they tap into that distrust.

But the law hasn’t changed as much as the conversation has.

The same basic principle still applies:

You can investigate wrongdoing.
You cannot create it.

The Bottom Line

Paying someone to infiltrate a group is not automatically illegal.

But the moment that infiltration turns into:

Pressure
Manipulation
Or manufactured crime

…it crosses a line the courts have been very clear about.

And once that line is crossed, the case—and sometimes the credibility of those behind it—falls apart.

Selective Outrage Is Killing Accountability

April 13, 2026May 6, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

The Rules Change—Depending on Who Breaks Them

When allegations hit Eric Swalwell, the reaction is immediate.

There isn't the same ethics being applied. — Eric Swalwell Hit With Double Standard

Cameras. Headlines. Demand

Resign. Investigate. Answer now!

That’s the system working—at least on the surface.

But step back—and the pattern becomes impossible to ignore:

The standard isn’t consistent. It’s conditional.

The Timeline They Don’t Want Side by Side

2026 — Swalwell

Allegations surface
Immediate national attention
Calls for resignation begin almost instantly

👉 Expectation set: Allegations alone demand action.

2024–Present — Matt Gaetz

Federal investigation tied to serious allegations
No charges filed; denies wrongdoing
Remains in office, politically active

👉 Reality: Survived the storm.

2025–Present — Cory Mills

Ethics scrutiny reported
Limited sustained national pressure
No decisive congressional action

👉 Reality: Investigation without urgency.

2022 — Tom Reed

Accused of misconduct
Resigned

👉 Reality: Consequence matched expectation.

Recent Cycles — Tony Gonzales

Personal controversy surfaces
Steps away politically
Little sustained national reckoning

👉 Reality: Quiet exits don’t trigger loud accountability.

Go Back Further—The Pattern Was Already There

This isn’t new. It didn’t start this year. Or last year.

Dennis Hastert

Long after leaving office, it was revealed he had sexually abused minors decades earlier
Served prison time—but only after financial crimes exposed the cover-up

👉 Reality: Power delayed accountability for years.

Mark Foley

Resigned in 2006 after explicit messages to congressional pages
Questions followed about who knew—and how long it was ignored

👉 Reality: Action came—but only after exposure became unavoidable.

Roy Moore

Accused of sexual misconduct involving minors during his campaign
Lost election—but retained strong political backing

👉 Reality: Allegations alone didn’t collapse support.

Jim Jordan

Accused by former athletes of ignoring abuse while a wrestling coach
Denied wrongdoing
Remains in Congress with no formal consequence

👉 Reality: Allegations alone didn’t trigger removal.

Now Step Back and Look at It Clearly

Across years. Across headlines. Across parties.

The pattern repeats:

Some accusations trigger immediate political collapse
Others linger, fade, or get absorbed into the noise
Some careers end overnight
Others continue uninterrupted

Same system. Different outcomes.

The Truth Voters Are Starting to Accept

This isn’t about one politician.
It isn’t even about one party.

It’s about a system where:

Outrage is selective
Pressure is strategic
Accountability is inconsistent

And once people see that clearly, something changes.

They stop reacting to the scandal.

They start questioning the system behind it.

Accountability Cannot Be Conditional

If the rule is:

“Allegations demand immediate scrutiny and consequences”

Then that rule must apply:

Every time
To everyone
Without exception

Because the moment it doesn’t—

It stops being accountability.

Final Word — The Line That Matters

This isn’t about defending Eric Swalwell.

It’s about whether the same fire lit under him
burns just as hot under everyone else.

Because if it doesn’t—

Then what we’re watching isn’t justice.
It isn’t integrity.
And it sure isn’t leadership.

It’s performance.
It’s protection.
It’s power deciding when truth matters.

Truth Endures

Not because politicians defend it.
Not because parties protect it.

But because, eventually—
people see it for themselves!

There should be resignations coming from more than just Democrats!

Truth Endures!

^{_{© Benjamin H. Groff II — Truth Endures / benandsteve.com}} _{^{Groff Media}}

Oklahoma’s Political Shift Isn’t Just Numbers — It’s the Loss of Local Control

April 11, 2026May 6, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

April 11, 2026

Oklahoma election officials report that as many as 13,000 registered voters have changed their political affiliation in recent months—many moving from Republican to Democrat or Independent. On paper, it looks like a routine shift. But beneath those numbers is something much deeper—and far more concerning.

Because Oklahoma hasn’t just changed parties over the years. It has lost its voice.

There was a time when this state was overwhelmingly Democratic, but more importantly—it was locally driven. Communities knew their candidates. Campaigns were built in barbershops, cafés, and courthouse hallways—not in distant boardrooms. Leaders rose from the people they represented. Even figures like Carl Albert carried Oklahoma values with them to Washington, not the other way around.

Back then, politics wasn’t perfect—but it was personal.

Southeastern Oklahoma—“Little Dixie”—held strong Democratic roots that reflected the culture and working-class backbone of the region. Even in places like Tulsa and the northeast, where conservatism had a firmer grip, the political identity was still shaped by local influence, local relationships, and local accountability.

That began to change when money entered the room—and never left.

Over time, national political machines and out-of-state interests realized something: Oklahoma was fertile ground. Campaigns stopped being about neighbors convincing neighbors. They became about funding streams, media buys, consultants, and narratives crafted far beyond state lines. The candidates may still live here—but the strategies, the messaging, and often the priorities do not.

Even towns like Elk City, Oklahoma remember a time when national figures still spoke directly to local communities. Jimmy Carter built much of his campaign on that very idea—making personal promises and treating small towns like they mattered. And when he became President, he was known for keeping those commitments, returning to places others might have forgotten.

That kind of connection is hard to imagine today.

When Carter passed, the coverage—especially at the local level—felt noticeably quiet in places where, years ago, a visit like his would have been remembered and retold. Maybe that’s time passing. Or maybe it says something more about where we are now—where national politics has grown louder, more divided, and more distant from the very communities it once depended on. And maybe it says more about the community’s morals.

And that’s the real shift.

It’s not Republican versus Democrat. It’s local versus national control.

What we’re witnessing now—even in something as simple as voter registration changes—is the continued unraveling of a system that once belonged to the people who lived here. The decisions that affect Oklahoma communities are increasingly influenced by voices that have never set foot on our streets, never sat in our cafés, and never had to answer directly to the people they impact.

Oklahoma didn’t just evolve politically. It was overtaken.

And the question now isn’t which party wins next.
It’s whether the people of this state will ever truly get their voice back. Even more importantly, will the people of Oklahoma ever stand and take their voice back!

This isn’t just an Oklahoma story—it applies to communities across the country. Every elected official, at every level, should be measured by one standard: are they truly representing the people they serve, or is it time for someone else to step in?

WHITE HOUSE ORDERS REMOVAL OF ALL D.C. CHERRY TREES; TEXAS TO ASSIST WITH DISPOSAL

April 1, 2026May 6, 2026Benjamin1 Comment

Reaction on Capitol Hill was swift—and, at times, confused.

By: B.H.Groff II Groff Media 2026

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a move that has surprised residents, historians, and seasonal tourists alike, the White House has issued an executive directive calling for the immediate removal of all cherry trees within the District of Columbia.

According to preliminary details released late Monday evening, the plan calls for the trees—long associated with the city’s springtime identity—to be cut down and processed for transport out of the nation’s capital.

Administration officials described the decision as part of a broader “landscape reassessment initiative,” though specifics surrounding the timing and necessity of the removal remain unclear.

“We’re clearing them out. Making room for more air and real estate!”

“This is about taking a fresh look at long-standing traditions and evaluating their place in a modern framework,” one official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “No element, no matter how iconic, is exempt from review.”

The cherry trees, many of which trace their origins to a 1912 gift from Japan, have been a defining feature of Washington’s Tidal Basin and surrounding areas for more than a century. Each year, the blossoms draw visitors from around the world during peak bloom.

Despite their cultural significance, crews have reportedly already begun staging equipment near key locations, with early removal efforts expected to begin within days.

TEXAS TO PLAY KEY ROLE IN DISPOSAL

In an unexpected interstate partnership, officials confirmed that the State of Texas has agreed to assist in the disposal process.

Under the arrangement, National Guard units from Texas would be deployed to Washington to process the felled trees, converting them into wood chips for transport back to the state.

Sources familiar with the plan say the material is expected to be repurposed for use in large-scale outdoor cooking operations, particularly during football season.

“We understand Texas has both the capacity and the appreciation for this kind of resource,” one official noted. “They see it as a practical solution.”

Texas officials have not released a formal statement but are said to be “fully prepared” to mobilize personnel once federal clearance is finalized.

“The Cherry Trees changed into woodchips would be perfect for smoking meats at football tailgate parties”

“The Cherry Trees changed into woodchips would be perfect for smoking meats at football tailgate parties” according to Texas officials.

CONGRESS WEIGHS IN

Reaction on Capitol Hill was swift—and, at times, confused, as lawmakers attempted to clarify both the intent and implications of the proposed cherry tree removal.

“It goes toward the whole DUI thing,” said one longtime, hood-covered House member, before being quietly corrected by a senator who clarified it was DEI—Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

“We don’t have to have cherry trees for equality,” the senator added, “but they are nice for flavoring vodka.”

Another lawmaker expressed frustration with the annual bloom. “These white flowery things get everywhere,” he said. “It’s a damn mess if you get a bunch of them in your hair.”

Not all were in favor of the removal.

“You know how bad this place is going to smell without them?” one visibly irritated member asked. “At least the trees covered up some of it.”

One senior committee chair, speaking in a tone usually reserved for matters of national security, offered a more technical justification.

“Cherry trees create a false sense of seasonal stability,” he said. “When citizens begin to expect predictable blooming cycles, it undermines our broader messaging on uncertainty. Removing them restores balance.”

While no formal vote has yet been scheduled, sources indicate bipartisan discussions are ongoing, with several members privately acknowledging they were unaware the trees were not, in fact, native to Texas.

PUBLIC REACTION MIXED

Residents and visitors expressed a range of reactions as news of the directive spread.

“I don’t know what Washington looks like without them,” said one local resident near the Tidal Basin. “It’s like taking away spring.”

“I don’t know what Washington looks like without them,” said one local resident near the Tidal Basin. “It’s like taking away spring.”

Tourism officials are reportedly monitoring the situation closely, with some expressing concern over the potential economic impact if the trees are removed before peak bloom.

Others, however, appeared less concerned.

“They’re just trees,” one passerby said. “I’m more worried about parking.”

IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE UNCLEAR

Federal agencies have yet to release a detailed timeline for the project, though internal memos suggest the work could begin as early as this week.

Environmental groups have not yet issued formal responses, but several advocacy organizations indicated they are reviewing the directive.

As crews prepare for what could be one of the most visible changes to the city’s landscape in decades, officials continue to emphasize that the effort is part of a broader evaluation of federal properties.

No official cost estimate has been released.

FINAL NOTE

Officials confirmed the directive will take effect at midnight on April 1st.

One senator from Texas is reportedly backing the measure with a special addendum, citing concerns he said arose during a recent winter vacation to Cancun. According to the senator, a video he viewed on YouTube suggested the original cherry trees—gifted by Japan in 1912—may have been engineered with embedded surveillance capabilities.

“Given what we now know,” he stated, “it would be irresponsible not to take a closer look.”

In the end, the cherry trees remain—and so does the tradition of April Fools’ Day.

“Trump may be first U.S. President to mythically cut down a cherry tree since George Washington,” top aide says!

*No trees were harmed in the making of this report—only expectations. Happy April Fools’ Day.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The “Final Note” in this story tells you this piece is satire—but in today’s climate, it doesn’t feel nearly as far-fetched as it should. As you move through the rest of the year, keep this in mind. We are living in a time when reality often outpaces even our most exaggerated imagination.

Benjamin

When the Press Begins to Look Over Its Shoulder

March 12, 2026May 6, 2026Benjamin3 Comments

There comes a time when you have to draw a line and decide what you stand for. Because if you don’t stand for something, sooner or later you’ll fall for anything.

March 12, 2026

This week I made the next announcement:

“I have made the decision to stop any association with content connected to CBS, CBS News, CNN, FOX, and Flipboard. I can no longer, in good conscience, republish material from these organizations. I also can’t promote content from organizations that use media in ways I find troubling.“

A Change in Direction

There are moments in history when small events start to reveal a much larger shift. What has been happening inside major American media organizations lately is one of those moments. Stephen Colbert is a prominent public voice. He finds himself at the center of controversy shortly after openly criticizing corporate decisions tied to network leadership. This situation naturally raises questions. Is outspoken criticism still welcome within the walls of the companies that broadcast it?

At the same time, reports of internal conflict surrounding the newsroom at 60 Minutes have emerged. These reports involve one of the most respected investigative news teams in television. They have only deepened those concerns. Leadership changes have occurred. Public statements from newsroom figures have surfaced. Accounts of staff unease suggest that journalists inside the organization are feeling pressures. These pressures extend beyond the simple business of reporting the news.

This is where the issue becomes larger than one show, one host, or even one network. The concern is about the atmosphere surrounding journalism itself. When reporters start to sense that pursuing certain stories will carry professional consequences, the chilling effect spreads quickly. Investigative reporting depends on courage, independence, and the understanding that truth—not corporate comfort or political pressure—guides editorial decisions.

My declaration about stepping away from redistributing material from major outlets is rooted in this concern. It is not an attack on journalism. In fact, it is the opposite. It is a defense of what journalism is supposed to be. A free press only remains free when reporters and editors can pursue facts without intimidation. They must be capable of chasing stories without fear of reprisal. Reporters should not have to wonder whether the story they are chasing will upset powerful interests behind the scenes.

Journalists should never have to look over their shoulder before telling the truth. If they do, the public will lose more than just a few television programs. They will also lose newspaper columns. We will lose something far more important. We will lose the ability to trust someone. Somewhere, someone is still willing to ask the hard questions.

History teaches us that the erosion of press freedom rarely begins with a dramatic announcement. It usually starts quietly—with a decision here, a resignation there, a story that suddenly feels too risky to pursue. The public does not notice at first. But journalists do. They feel the shift in the air long before anyone else sees it. When reporters question if the truth cost them their platform, the damage has begun. They question if it risks their career or the support of their newsroom. This damage shows that fear is overshadowing press freedom. My decision to step back from amplifying certain media outlets is not born from anger. It is born from concern. A healthy democracy depends on journalists who can pursue facts without fear. If the press ever needs to seek permission to reveal the truth, the public will suffer. This greater loss impacts more than just a television program or a headline. We will have lost our watchdog.

It is up to us. The average Joe. To start doing something. What will you do?

3 responses to “When the Press Begins to Look Over Its Shoulder”

Hazel

March 12, 2026

It’s one of my concerns, too. The job of journalists and reporters becomes risky now. They’re not safe if they tell the truth, especially since powerful people are involved in it. I don’t know about news these days if it’s true or just be polished to protect someone else. The media becomes chaotic, as well as politics. I don’t understand, and I dislike to hear something disgusting about it.

Reply
1. Benjamin
  
  March 12, 2026
  
  Thank you, Hazel. Many people are torn between speaking up or staying quiet and hoping things change. But dust doesn’t move unless someone disturbs it. Sometimes the only way to slow what’s happening is to challenge it. If my words inspire even one person to act, and that person inspires another, then they have done their job.
  
  Reply
  1. Hazel
    
    March 12, 2026
    
    Yeah. Hopefully some are courageous enough to speak and make a change. We’ll never know. My pleasure, Benjamin. Healing vibes to you.

What you leave today becomes someone’s answer tomorrow.Cancel reply

The Day Jimmy Carter Came To Town

December 31, 2025December 6, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

One year ago former U.S. President Jimmy Carter passed away. We close this year with a celebration to his life. Recognizing his many accomplishments. Here is one, a promise he had made on the campaign trail before he was elected to office. That if he won the presidency, he would return to Elk City, Oklahoma and thank them. He upheld that promise, as well as many others he made. A man with true humility, honesty and principles. Sorely missed as an example to others. We honor a true a leader by remembering his life!

Groff Media 2024© Truth Endures IMDbPro

Presented by benandsteve.com By: Benjamin Groff II©

3–5 minutes

On March 24th, 1979, President Jimmy Carter returned to Oklahoma. He came to fulfill a campaign promise he had made during his first run for office. While campaigning, he passed through Elk City, Oklahoma, and vowed that if elected, he would return as President. True to his word, he came back to this small western Oklahoma town to connect with its residents.

By then, the memory of President Ford’s near-assassination and other threats against public figures lingered in the national consciousness. Carter was a peanut farmer from Plains, Georgia. He resonated with Oklahoma Citizens through his humility and shared values. This included his Democratic Party affiliation. First Lady Rosalynn Carter was accompanying him. Her warmth and grace complemented her husband. She left a positive impression on the locals.

At the time, Oklahoma’s Governor George Nigh was a celebrated figure in state politics. George Nigh was elected Lieutenant Governor more times than anyone else. He briefly served as Governor multiple times. This occurred when his predecessors resigned to take other offices. Despite some legal challenges about his eligibility, the State Supreme Court affirmed his ability to serve. He was now in his first full term as Governor. His presence at Carter’s visit added to the significance of the occasion.

The visit brought much excitement and preparation to Elk City, a town of about 12,000. The oil boom had not yet transformed the region. The high school’s field house was the largest venue available for the gathering. Elk City did not have an airport that accommodates Air Force One. Thus, the nearby Clinton-Sherman Airbase in Burns Flat, 15 miles east, was reactivated for the President’s arrival. A motorcade transported President Carter and his entourage to Elk City.

The event attracted widespread attention, with media outlets from a five-state area descending on the town. Governor Nigh, Oklahoma’s First Lady, U.S. Senators, Representatives, and many state officials joined the crowd. The field house overflowed with locals eager to witness history.

President Carter took the stage after introductions by various community leaders. His speech was marked by humility, sincerity, and a willingness to engage directly with the audience. During a question-and-answer session, a young girl boldly asked for a kiss. The President graciously obliged. This act endeared him further to the crowd.

Unlike many politicians who have returned to the comfort of Washington, D.C., President Carter chose to stay overnight at the home of Elk City Mayor Larry Wade. While he and Rosalynn rested, Elk City police officers securely guarded their limousine. It was stored in the fire department’s bay. The fire trucks were temporarily parked on the street. This allowed room for the vehicle. The bay doors were locked to make sure its secure.

The next morning, the Secret Service inspected and prepared the limousine for the journey back to the Clinton-Sherman Airbase. At 7:00 AM, President and Mrs. Carter were to be escorted by a motorcade that included local police and the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. But the Carters had been invited to church. And to church they would go. The President’s and First Lady’s Church attendance was unannounced and brief. Two routes were used to guarantee security, though the President’s exact route remains uncertain. By 8:15 AM, all vehicles converged at the church. The Carters left church and went to the Clinton – Sherman Airfield, near Burns Flat. “Nothing is to schedule” one news reporter was noted as saying. And, for the Secret Service, they appreciated it wasn’t. The changes in the planned activity helped create enough of a distraction.

As Air Force One prepared for departure, President Carter and Rosalynn climbed the stairway. They turned to wave goodbye to the assembled crowd. Then, they boarded the plane. Within minutes, the jet’s engines roared to life. It ascended into the blue Oklahoma sky. The departure left behind a community that felt valued and appreciated.

Jimmy Carter’s visit to Elk City exemplified his commitment to keeping promises and connecting with everyday Americans. Years after making his pledge, he returned to this western Oklahoma town. This return reflected the integrity and personal touch that characterized his presidency.

A Great American Life Cut Tragically Short: Remembering Rob Reiner & Michele Singer Reiner

December 17, 2025December 17, 2025Benjamin2 Comments

4–6 minutes

It Began At A Friends Christmas Party.

An argument disrupted a party at Conan O’Brien’s Christmas Party. Now Conan is reportedly “wracked with guilt” over what happened in his home that night. Guests at the party said the younger Reiner was “freaking out”. Nick was reportedly going from guest to guest asking them “if they were famous?” Which is believed to have started a dispute between he and his father. Conan thinks he should have intervened when he looks back. Instead, he said all three of the Reiners left his party and went home.

On December 14, 2025, the world was shaken by the devastating news. Rob Reiner, one of America’s most beloved artists and civic voices. And his wife photographer Michele Singer Reiner, were found fatally wounded. Murdered in their Brentwood, Los Angeles home. Their their son, Nick Reiner, now charged with their murders. Leaving a profound void in Hollywood and in public life. And stunning the hearts of millions who admired their work and their lives around the world. (1)

A Life in the Arts — From Screen to Story

Rob Reiners rise to prominence was nothing short of extraordinary. Rob was born in the Bronx in 1947. He was born to entertainment royalty — his father was the legendary comedian Carl Reiner. Rob built a career that spanned decades and mediums. He first captured America’s imagination as Michael “Meathead” Stivic on All in the Family. This performance earned him Emmy recognition. It also made him a household name. (2)

But it was behind the camera that Reiner truly reshaped American cinema. As a director and producer, he brought to life some of the most cherished films of the late 20th century:

This Is Spinal Tap — a cult classic that redefined mockumentary comedy. (2)
Stand by Me — a timeless coming-of-age masterpiece. (2)
The Princess Bride — a fairy tale beloved by generations. (2)
When Harry Met Sally… — one of the great romantic comedies in film history. (2)
A Few Good Men — a gripping courtroom drama that became a cultural touchstone. (2)

His storytelling was more than entertainment; it was empathetic, insightful, and deeply human — reflecting the best of American imagination.

A Partner in Life and Purpose

Standing beside Rob was Michele Singer Reiner, his wife of more than three decades. Michele’s talents went beyond her role as a devoted partner and mother. She was a gifted photographer and producer. Michele was celebrated in her own right. Her work included collaborations on various cultural projects. Her creative eye helped shape the visual landscape of many endeavors they pursued together. (2)

Michele was not merely a support to Rob. She was an equal force of creativity, compassion, and conviction. She embodied a deep commitment to both art and advocacy.

Champions of Humanity and Civic Duty

Rob and Michele Reiner were not content to rest solely on artistic laurels. They were passionate advocates for causes that show the best instincts of our nation. Rob’s political engagement spanned early childhood education, civil rights, and marriage equality. His involvement made him a fierce public voice for inclusion, justice, and the dignity of all people. He helped co-found influential organizations and leveraged his platform to support progressive civic causes. (3)

Michele’s activism and advocacy were equally meaningful. She championed marginalized communities through her work with LGBTQ+ organizations and children’s welfare initiatives. She lent her voice to efforts that made tangible differences in people’s lives. (2)

Together, they represented a model of creative achievement married with civic responsibility. This reminds us that success in culture and in conscience are not mutually exclusive. Instead, they are mutually enriching.

A Loss Shared by the Nation

The response to their deaths reflects the breadth of lives they touched. Tributes poured in from Hollywood friends like Billy Crystal, Albert Brooks, and Martin Short. Political figures across the spectrum also honored their legacy and mourned the immense loss. Friends called them a “special force devoted to public betterment,” highlighting their generosity, their creativity, and their tireless spirit. (3)

Why We Should Honor Them

The Reiners lived by the same ethic exemplified by Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter. They shared a commitment to service, compassion, and purpose. Like President Carter, they devoted themselves to doing good whenever they can. They aimed to help for as long as possible and in many ways.

If America needed to memorialize a pair, they would choose Rob and Michele Singer Reiner. Their lives reflected the highest values of artistic brilliance. They showed humanitarian commitment and civic leadership. The Reiners embody artistic brilliance and humanitarian dedication. Civic leadership was a fundamental part of their legacy. They stand at the top of that list. Their tragic end came at the hands of a loved one struggling with personal demons. This only deepens the poignancy of their story. It underscores life’s fragility, even for those who seem larger than it.

To remember them is not only to celebrate iconic films and photographs. It is also to proclaim a narrative about what it means to care for one another. It shows how to invest in the common good. Ultimately, it encourages us to leave the world better than we found it — through art, action, and advocacy.

A highway will probably never bear their name. It is unlikely that a statue will stand in their likeness at the center of a campus. No one will demand that students memorize every detail of what they did — and that is just fine. They would not have sought those honors anyway. The Reiners never worked for recognition; they worked for purpose. And that is precisely why they will forever be remembered as heroes to so many. The Reiners — the truest expression of what an American life can be.

WHEN THE LIGHTS DON’T WARN — THEY PULL

December 13, 2025December 13, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

A SPECIAL PUBLICATION FOR DECEMBER 13th, 2025

Are modern LED emergency strobes increasing the risk to first responders on America’s roadways?

3–5 minutes

First responders are trained to notice patterns long before studies are commissioned or policies are rewritten. Sometimes danger announces itself not with a single catastrophic event, but with repetition—quiet, unsettling repetition. Over a single 24-hour period, I recorded eight separate headlines. Each headline involved police officers being struck by vehicles while working crashes or traffic stops. Eight. Different states. Different agencies. Same outcome. This situation raises a controversial and long overdue question. Are modern LED strobe lights unintentionally putting first responders in greater danger?

There was a time when emergency lights rotated. They swept. They moved with rhythm. The old beacons gave drivers something important—a visual break. A moment for the brain to process direction, distance, and motion. Today’s LED systems don’t rotate; they pulse. Rapidly.

Aggressively. Relentlessly. High-intensity strobes which floods the visual field, especially at night. Instead of guiding a driver away from danger, it overwhelms the brain’s ability to react. The result, in theory, is not panic—but fixation. The eyes lock on. The vehicle drifts toward the brightest point. Not out of intent, but neurological confusion.

Some call it “target fixation,” a phenomenon well known to pilots, motorcyclists, and tactical drivers. Under stress, humans often steer toward what they’re staring at—even when that object shows danger. Combine that instinct with modern LED strobes. These strobes flash faster than the brain comfortably processes. The warning light becomes a lure. A hypnotic point of focus. A tragic beacon.

Eight Officers Were Struck In 24 Hours. Different States. Same Strobe Style Lighting.

Is it time to ask whether modern emergency strobes are warning drivers—or pulling them in?

Within just one day, these were the headlines recorded:

• 1 arrested for allegedly driving while intoxicated after rear-ending a police cruiser on I-465

• Las Vegas police officer injured after vehicle hit while investigating a separate crash

• Effingham County deputy hospitalized after being struck by a vehicle, authorities confirm

• Police cruiser struck by car, officer injured in Naugatuck

• State trooper vehicle damaged after being hit during a traffic stop

• Norman police officer critically injured after being struck by a car on State Highway 9

• Winston-Salem police officer injured after impaired driver crashed into three patrol cars

• Waterbury man injured Naugatuck officer in hit-and-run crash

Eight incidents. One recurring element: emergency lighting designed to protect, now contributing to harm.

This is not an indictment of technology, nor a dismissal of impaired or reckless driving. Accountability still matters. But safety demands that we ask difficult questions—even when the answers challenge long-standing assumptions. If the very lights meant to warn motorists are instead disorienting them, then tradition, training, and procurement policies deserve re-examination.

Officers and firefighters shouldn’t have to stand in the road. They shouldn’t be wondering whether the light behind them is helping. They shouldn’t wonder if it’s painting a target on their back.

Sometimes progress requires us to look backward. Sometimes the old way worked better. And sometimes, the most dangerous thing on the roadside isn’t the driver who fails to slow down. Instead, it’s the light that never lets them look away.

This isn’t meant to be the final word — it’s meant to start a conversation.

If you’re a first responder, dispatcher, firefighter, EMT, tow operator, or a motorist, your experience matters. If you have ever felt disoriented by modern emergency lighting, your experience matters.

Have you noticed drivers drifting toward scenes instead of away from them? Do today’s LED strobes feel different than the rotating lights of the past? Or do you believe visibility has improved safety overall?

Share your thoughts, experiences, or observations in the comments. Respectful discussion is encouraged. If patterns are being noticed on the roadside long before they’re studied in boardrooms, it’s worth listening. Lives depend on it.

About the Author:

Benjamin Groff is a former police officer and radio news anchor. He has hosted programs for CNN and ABC News affiliates in Oklahoma, Colorado, and Wyoming. His career in law enforcement began in 1980 and lasted more than two decades. This gave him first hand insight into the criminal mind and public safety. Moreover, it provided him with an understanding of the human stories that often go untold. His writing draws on these experiences, blending street-level truth with a journalist’s eye for the bigger picture.

Alice Kessler & Ellen Kessler — Twin Lives, Shared Stardom, and a Final Choice Together

November 20, 2025November 18, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

3–4 minutes

Alice and Ellen Kessler were born on August 20, 1936, in Nerchau, Saxony, Germany. From early childhood, they trained in ballet and performance, eventually emerging as a dazzling twin act in post-war Europe. They became known internationally for their synchronized dancing, singing, and television appearances. They found particular fame in Italy, where they were dubbed “Le gemelle Kessler”.

They appeared in films like Love and the Frenchwoman and Dead Woman from Beverly Hills . Their careers expanded beyond dance into acting.

Shared Career, Shared Life

For decades, they performed as a unit—twins inseparable both on and off stage. Their image of elegance, glamour, and synchronized precision made them icons of entertainment in the 1950s and 1960s. Their bond remained strong even as they stepped away from the spotlight, ultimately returning to Germany and settling near Munich.

Their Final Days & Decision

On November 17, 2025, both Alice and Ellen passed away in Grünwald, Bavaria, Germany, at the age of 89. Their cause of death is reported as assisted suicide. They made this decision together. It reflects how they had lived life: side by side.

The sisters had long ago expressed the wish to be cremated together. They wanted their ashes placed in a single urn, according to reports. They had indicated they no longer wished to continue their current life. They chose to end their lives together.

Why They Made That Choice

While the intimate details of their decision stay personal, the public record suggests the following contributing factors:

Age and quality of life: At 89, they faced the realities of aging. Having lived their whole careers, they wished to face death by choice rather than decline.
Deep bond: Their identity had been formed around always being together—professionally and personally. The decision to depart together echoes the unity they maintained for nearly nine decades.
Autonomy in the final act: In Germany, since 2019, medical aid in dying has been legal under certain conditions. This involves an individual administering prescribed medication themselves. They chose the timing, setting, and manner—affirming their autonomy to the end.

Legacy and Reflection

Alice and Ellen stay symbols of an era of variety-show glamour. They epitomize cross-European entertainment. Their twin synergy is unmatched by few acts. But beyond their performance, their final act raises profound questions about dignity. It also questions companionship and the nature of choice at the end of life.

Their journey is a full-circle narrative for fans, historians, and those intrigued by human stories. They start as childhood ballet students. They become international stars. Finally, they become co-authors of their own end. It shows how life can be lived. It also demonstrates how life can be shared and completed on one’s own terms.

Closing Thoughts Remembering The Kessler Sisters

How many partnerships in life are built to last so long, and so deeply?

The Kessler twins remind us of devotion not only to craft, but to each other. In their final act, they teach us something tender and unsettling. They reveal the power of choice, the weight of togetherness, and the mystery of closure.

Latest on the Kessler Twins’ passing –

NEWS BULLETIN. TUESDAY NOVEMBER 19, 2025

The Kessler Twins have left this world together.

Alice Kessler and Ellen Kessler—German twin sisters who performed as a variety entertainment duo—died by joint assisted suicide at their home in Gruenwald, Germany, on Nov. 17, according to the German Society for Humane Dying (DGHS).

“They had been considering this option for some time,” the association, which advocates for the right to a self-determined death, said in a statement to NBC News. “They had been members of the organization for over a year.”

Explaining that those “who choose this option in Germany must be absolutely clear-headed, meaning free and responsible,” the organization noted that the sisters engaged in thorough discussions with a lawyer and a doctor before setting on this path.

“The decision must be thoughtful and consistent,” the DGHS added, “meaning made over a long period of time and not impulsive.”

Assisted dying is legal in Germany, with the country’s constitutional court ruling in 2020 that an individual has the right to end their life and seek help from a third party under certain circumstances.

MEMORIAL: VIDEO – NOT A DRY EYE IN THE HOUSE

The Howard Family Intervention: When the All-American Dream Met the Algorithm

November 11, 2025October 29, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

4–5 minutes

The Howard family always seemed so functional to their neighbors in Bessieville. Their home glowed warmly in the evenings. The paint was always fresh, the hedges trimmed. To the outside world, the Howard’s — Frank, Lois, and their three boys — were the picture of American perfection.

Frank Howard worked as a supervisor at the local airplane plant. Lois split her time between home and the grocery store checkout. Their sons, Mark, Tim, and John, were the type of kids people admired. Others often said, “Now there’s a good family.”

So when Lois stumbled across the box in John’s room, she felt her stomach drop. Inside were pamphlets, flyers, and web printouts — literature no parent ever expects to find.

Frank walked in just as she was holding one, her hand trembling.
“Ann,” he said, “what’s going on?”

“I—I hope this is for a school paper,” she stammered. “I don’t know why he’d have this stuff. There’s so much of it!”

Frank thumbed through the stack. “Holy hell. Does he even know what this thing does to people? We raised him better than this.”

Moments later, Mark dropped by to visit. Seeing his parents in his brother’s room, he asked, “What’s up? You two look like you just found a body.”

Ann handed him a pamphlet. Mark’s eyes widened.
“Where’s he get this? Do you think he’s…?”

Both parents answered in unison: “No! God no!”

Before they speculate further, Frank’s phone buzzed. It was their middle son, Tim.
“Hey Pop, I’ve been calling the house — Ma not answering again? Everything okay?”

Frank hesitated. “We just have… a situation. Did you ever notice your brother getting into anything strange lately?”

Tim laughed. “What’d he do, join a cult?”

Ann shouted from across the room: “Yes! That’s exactly what it looks like!”

Within the hour, Tim was racing home. A few fraternity brothers were in tow. He called them his “Frat-Team.”

When they arrived, Frank showed them the contents of the box. One of the frat boys, a computer science major, said, “Let’s check his laptop.” Within minutes, they uncovered a disturbing digital trail. When they turned the screen toward Frank, he muttered, “I need a drink.”

By now, the grandparents had arrived. The house was full. They decided to wait for John’s return, convinced they “save” him from whatever this was.

At 8:30 sharp, the back door creaked open.
“Hey,” John said, stepping inside. “What’s with all the cars? Mom selling Tupperware again?”

“Sit in the yellow chair,” Frank said. His voice left no room for argument. “And don’t say a word.”

John sat, confused.
“Son,” Lois began, “are you… flirting around with extremists?”

John blinked. “What? Ma, I don’t think so.”

Frank held up one of the pamphlets. “Then what’s this?”

Suddenly, John’s tone hardened. His face twisted with anger.
“You people are blind! You sit here preaching love and tolerance while the country rots from the inside out. You call it compassion — I call it weakness!”

The room fell silent.

Grandpa Howard stood, slapped his knee, and gasped.
“My God — he’s a conservative!”

Grandma wailed, “Frank! Ann! You’ve got yourselves a Republican!”

Mark leaned back in his wheelchair, groaning. “It’s worse. He’s been indoctrinated. He’s deep into it — the algorithms, the podcasts, the memes…”

Ann sobbed. “How did this happen? We raised him right. We had PBS, not Fox!”

Frank gritted his teeth. “We can fix this. There’s a camp that reverses it. Teaches kids empathy again.”

The frat boys nodded. “Or we can bring him to a few Pride Parades,” one said. “Exposure therapy.”

That’s when John exploded. He cursed his family. He hurled coasters across the room. He shouted about “real patriots” and “fighting the deep state.”

No one noticed the faint red light blinking on one frat boy’s phone. They’d been recording the whole scene.

Moments later, two uniformed officers stepped inside — Toby and Rex. Toby, a family friend, looked bewildered.
“Good Lord, what’s going on here? Is he possessed?”

Rex shook his head solemnly. “No. I’ve seen it before. Same thing happened to my parents. They started watching those ‘news’ streams online. By Thanksgiving, they were threatening to burn our pronoun mugs.”

Ann gasped. “Oh sweet Jesus.”

Frank turned toward his son, voice trembling between rage and heartbreak.
“John, listen to me. We can still get you back. But we have to act now. Before it’s too late.”

John sneered. “Too late for what? To stop me from voting?”

And with that, he stormed out the door, leaving the room in stunned silence.

Grandpa finally muttered, “Well, guess the boy’s all grown up now.”

The family sat frozen — the hum of the refrigerator filling the void where laughter used to live.

In the background the local television news reported bloody attacks on black students leaving a GED Class that evening. The suspects identified as young white males. Who used Molotov cocktails yelling white power and God chooses a white America as they escaped on bicycles.

Outside, the streetlight flickered over the Howards’ perfect little home. It was still warm and still well-kept. Now, forever, it is just a little bit haunted.

The Island – A Serialized Dystopian Story * Chapter Seven

October 28, 2025October 5, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

2–3 minutes

Haven’s Reach: The Fracture Extended

By the time autumn winds rolled across Haven’s Reach, something in the air had shifted. The Council’s decrees were no longer whispered with unease. They were shouted from wooden platforms. The decrees were painted on walls and nailed to doors. “Obedience is Freedom,” one sign read. “Order Before All,” declared another. The rules had once been tolerated as minor irritations. Now, they pressed down like a boot on the neck of the people.

It began with curfews. Families were ordered indoors at dusk, lanterns extinguished by the ninth bell. Then came the bans. First, there was one on foreign books. Next, gatherings of more than five were forbidden. Finally, music played in public squares was banned. One by one, pieces of life that had once defined Haven’s Reach fell away. The Council insisted it was “for safety.” But everyone knew better—fear was safer for rulers than for the ruled.

Harper saw it most clearly when her younger brother, Eli, vanished. One evening, he was at the bakery kneading dough by her side. The next morning, his cot was empty. Blankets were folded neatly as though no one had ever lived there. Whispers reached her ears: Eli had spoken too freely about the Council in the market, and someone had reported him. Now he was “detained for questioning.” No one who had been questioned ever came home the same.

Harper’s grief sharpened into something more complex. She began wandering beyond her bakery’s door after curfew, listening at corners, watching shadows. That’s how she stumbled across The Quiet Ones. It was a ragtag circle of neighbors, merchants, and teachers. They took it upon themselves to preserve what the Council feared most: memory. They hid forbidden books in flour sacks. They scribbled children’s rhymes on the backs of ledgers. They whispered songs under their breath in defiance.

When Harper revealed her brother’s name, the Quiet Ones did not look away. An older man with ink-stained hands touched her shoulder and said,

“You’re one of us now, whether you meant to be or not. The fight isn’t about one boy. It’s about all of us.”

The fracture had come—not just between ruler and ruled, but within the people themselves. Some chose silence and survival. Others, like Harper, chose risk and resistance. Haven’s Reach was no longer simply an island under rule. It was a tinderbox, waiting for a single spark to ignite.

The Island – A Serialized Dystopian Story * Chapter Six

October 27, 2025October 5, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

1–2 minutes

Haven’s Reach: The Fracture

The Council had grown bolder. Every decree was sharper, every rule stricter. Posters lined the streets declaring “Silence is Loyalty” and “Order is Freedom.”

The town square, which once hosted songs and dances, now echoed with speeches warning against disobedience.

But in the shadows, the first cracks in the island’s facade appeared. Whispers of a hidden circle spread. These were citizens who refused to bow. They scribbled forbidden words in chalk on walls at night. They dared to question the Council’s iron grip. They called themselves The Quiet Ones.

Harper, a baker’s daughter, stumbled upon their meeting one night while searching for her missing brother. What she found shocked her: not rebels with weapons, but ordinary people with books, old radios, and forbidden songs. They weren’t plotting war—they were keeping alive the memory of freedom.

The Council had crushed the voices in the streets, but underground, Haven’s Reach was beginning to murmur again.

Top Financial Worries in 2025: What You Need to Know

October 12, 2025September 8, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

2–3 minutes

The Biggest Concern Facing People Today

We live in a world filled with constant change and uncertainty. One theme keeps bubbling to the surface no matter where you look: economic anxiety. Money-related worries top the charts of what keeps people awake at night. These concerns range from the price of groceries to the dream of owning a home.

What the Numbers Say

A Gallup poll from April 2025 found that:

60% of Americans worry “a great deal” about the economy.
59% lose sleep over healthcare costs.
56% are stressed about inflation.
Nearly half worry about Social Security and the federal budget deficit.

Globally, it’s no different. According to Ipsos, the leading concerns include inflation (30%), poverty (29%), unemployment (28%), and corruption (26%).

To make matters feel even heavier, 77% of Americans believe it’s harder to buy a home today. They feel it’s more difficult than it was for past generations. That frustration touches nearly every household—young people trying to buy, older adults trying to downsize, and families squeezed in between.

How It Touches Our Daily Lives

_{^{Staying together through rough times!}}

This isn’t just about numbers—it’s about people. Rising rent, higher grocery bills, climbing medical costs—each of these chip away at security. Families cut corners, young people delay milestones like marriage or kids, and many retirees wonder if their savings will last.

Economic stress also spills into mental health, relationships, and communities. When you feel like you’re always one paycheck away from disaster, it’s hard to focus on thriving—you’re stuck surviving.

What You Can Do

While we can’t solve inflation or rewrite housing policy alone, there are small, powerful steps we can take:

_{^{The Mysteries of Financial Security.}}

Focus on control: Create a budget and stick to it. Even small wins matter.
Cut back strategically: Trim unnecessary expenses, but give yourself permission to keep the things that bring you joy.
Tap into resources: Community groups, food banks, and local organizations often have programs to ease the burden.
Stay connected: Talking about financial stress reduces shame. You’re not alone.

The Takeaway

The economy, healthcare, inflation—they’re big, intimidating problems. But your response doesn’t have to be. Focus on what you can control. Find support in your community. Remember: sometimes resilience comes not from having more, but from facing less with wisdom, planning, and hope.

This Is So True And To The Point “What We Call Hate” Defines Many Of Those We Sometimes Don’t Understand

October 1, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

https://zewayestudio.wordpress.com/2025/10/01/what-we-call-hate/#like-597?page_id=597

GARY INDIANA CRIME RATES HIGHER THAN CHICAGO

September 5, 2025September 4, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

4–5 minutes

**^{_{Indiana Governor Michael Braun}}**

Why Isn’t Indiana Governor Mike Braun

Being Given National Guard Help?

Chicago is often spotlighted for its crime statistics. Yet, Gary, Indiana consistently ranks higher in many key crime metrics. This is true even when compared on a per-capita basis.

Chicago often dominates headlines for crime. Yet, FBI data and neighborhood crime indexes reveal a different story. Residents in Gary, Indiana, face significantly higher per-capita risks of violent and property crimes. According to NeighborhoodScout, Gary’s violent crime rate stands at roughly 1,180 per 100,000 residents—nearly double Chicago’s rate of 673.5.

President Trump reportedly plans to send National Guard troops to Chicago to tackle crime. If crime is really the concern, those service members should go just across the border to Gary. Decades of statistics show even higher rates staring them in the face. This report includes the data and sources to prove it. So the real question is: why isn’t the Guard going to Indiana? Maybe they know they can’t go back there.

Gary, Indiana — Higher Crime Rates Than Chicago

Violent crime in Gary is approximately 11.8 per 1,000 residents, or 1,180 per 100,000, significantly above national averages and surpassing Chicago’s violent crime rate of 673.5 per 100,000.Reolink Niche
Your odds of being a victim of violent crime in Gary are about 1 in 112. This is compared to Chicago’s overall violent crime rate.NeighborhoodScout
Property crimes are also markedly higher: a 1 in 35 chance in Gary versus substantially lower in Chicago.NeighborhoodScout

Why Gary Stands Out

Gary’s elevated crime levels have been well-documented over the years. These range from a ‘1993 Murder Capital’ billboard warning to recent statistics. Recent data shows some of the highest violence and theft rates in the nation.The Trace Macrotrends
Despite improvements in some categories, Gary remains one of Indiana’s most dangerous cities. It often exceeds Chicago in both violent and property crime rates.

Quick Comparison

City	Violent Crime (per 100,000)	Property Crime Odds
Gary, IN	~1,180	1 in 35 victims
Chicago, IL	673.5	Lower than Gary’s rate

There Is More To Review

Yes—Gary, Indiana, a smaller city just southeast of Chicago, has higher crime rates than Chicago on a per-capita level. Though Chicago may grab more headlines, Gary’s challenges with both violent and property crime are even more severe.

1. Gary, IN — Highest Crime in Indiana

Violent Crime Rate: Gary records approximately 11.8 incidents per 1,000 residents, making it the highest violent crime rate in the state Reolink+1.
Property Crime Chance: On an individual level, the chance of being a victim in Gary is 1 in 112 for violent crime. The odds are 1 in 35 for property crime. NeighborhoodScout.
Daily Crime Risk: Overall, you face a 1 in 27 chance per year of becoming a crime victim in Gary. Check more on Areavibes.
Safety Map Insights: Neighborhood safety varies widely. In central areas, residents face up to a 1 in 67 chance of violent crime. In safer southwestern zones, that drops to 1 in 137 Reddit.
Citywide Crime Index: Gary’s total crime rate runs at about 59.75 incidents per 1,000 residents, compared to roughly 33.37 nationally nextdoor.com.
Recent Trends: Encouragingly, Gary’s Police Department reported a notable drop in violent crime and fatal traffic accidents in 2024. They also noted increased proactive patrols in Gary, Indiana.

2. Chicago, IL — Larger Scale, Lower Per-Capita Risk

Comparative Crime Index (Gary vs. Chicago):
- Violent Crime: Chicago reports about 21% more violent crime overall. Still, because of its much higher population, the individual risk remains lower than in Gary BestPlaces.
- Property Crime: Chicago’s rate is approximately 30% lower than Gary’s BestPlaces.
Detailed Numbers (NeighborhoodScout): The chance of being a victim of violent crime in Chicago is about 1 in 167. In Gary, it is 1 in 112. Property crime risk in Chicago is about 1 in 29, slightly better than Gary’s 1 in 35 NeighborhoodScout Areavibes.

3. Lake County Overview

Lake County averages around 395 violent crimes per 100,000 residents. This figure is slightly higher than national averages near 360 per 100,000. Axios+1 Wikipedia+1.
Economic Impact: Crime-related costs, including emotional and tangible losses, are significant across the county.

Quick Comparison Table

Location	Violent Crime Risk	Property Crime Risk	Notes
Gary, IN	1 in 112 (high risk)	1 in 35 (high risk)	Among “most dangerous” cities in Indiana
Chicago, IL	Lower individual risk	Slightly lower than Gary	Larger scale but safer per capita
Lake County, IN	Slightly above average	Mixed	Crime concentrated in urban pockets like Gary

Summary

Gary, Indiana, has significantly higher violent and property crime rates—both per-capita—than Chicago. Despite Chicago’s national notoriety, individuals face greater personal risk in Gary.
Lake County overall carries elevated crime levels, but the burden is not uniform—it’s concentrated in areas like Gary.
Positive note: There are signs of progress, especially in Gary. Proactive policing has reduced violent crime. It has also improved safety initiatives.

About the Author:

Benjamin Groff is a former police officer and radio news anchor. He has hosted programs for CNN and ABC News affiliates in Colorado and Wyoming. His career in law enforcement began in 1980 and lasted more than two decades. This gave him firsthand insight into the criminal mind and public safety. Moreover, it provided him with an understanding of the human stories that often go untold. His writing draws on these experiences, blending street-level truth with a journalist’s eye for the bigger picture.

Branded You Are Now – Marked!

August 24, 2025August 12, 2025Benjamin1 Comment

When the law decides you no longer exist, freedom isn’t about where you live.

It’s about how far you’re willing to lose yourself to survive.

2–3 minutes

Getting Marked – Freedom at a cost

What if you belonged to a group that the government suddenly decided was a problem?

Not because of anything you did. Not because of a crime. Not even because of your beliefs. You were placed quietly and without your knowledge. The current leaders decided that the category was “unjust.”

Illegal.

It didn’t matter that you’d lived here your whole life. That your parents and grandparents had, too. It didn’t matter your race, your sex, your creed, your record. None of that mattered anymore. The only thing that mattered was that you had been identified.

The rules you thought protected you suddenly didn’t apply.

Your home wasn’t yours. Your job will vanish with a keystroke. The bank will empty your account without notice. You weren’t even a “person” anymore, not in the legal sense described by the Constitution you once believed in.

It happened so fast you couldn’t trace the moment when it began. At first, it was a news story about “reforms.” Then, “temporary measures.” Then, new identification cards, “to streamline services.” People told themselves it was nothing — until the cards became color-coded. Until the colors meant everything.

Now the world feels smaller every day. Friends stop calling, not because they don’t care, but because they’re afraid to be seen caring. Even strangers look at you differently, as if they’re silently choosing whether to turn away or turn you in.

You start making plans. Options. But they’re illusions. Leave the country? Borders are closed to you. Fight back? With what? Every avenue seems to end at the same locked door.

Then one night, in the quiet of your apartment, you find a letter slipped under your door. No name. No return location. Just a single sentence:

“There’s a way out, but you can’t take anything with you.”

Your heart pounds. Hope flares in your chest — real, breathing hope for the first time in months. You imagine stepping across a border, leaving all this behind, starting over somewhere no one knows your name.

But then the weight comes crashing back. You can’t take anything with you. Not your family, if they’re marked. Not your home. Not even the history that made you who you are.

The choice is yours. Stay and lose everything slowly, or leave and lose it all at once.

It’s hope. And it’s despair.

And tonight, both feel exactly the same.

Will you let this country get to this point? Is the United States already there? Is it too late to turn around?

By Benjamin GroffMedia© | benandsteve.com | 2025

The Cost Of Doing Away With The Government

August 17, 2025August 7, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

The Cost of Cutting Costs: Where Are the Savings Going?

How Trump is starting to shape the job market

In recent years, the Trump Administration has made headlines for its policy stances. It has also garnered attention for the sweeping federal cutbacks. These cutbacks have redefined the size and role of the federal government. Thousands of government employees have been laid off. Hundreds of federal offices have been shuttered. A wide range of services — from healthcare to environmental aid — has been reduced or eliminated entirely.

The administration has championed these actions as part of a broader effort to “drain the swamp.” They aim to reduce federal spending and ultimately return power and resources to American taxpayers. The rationale has been clear. A leaner federal government would lead to significant cost savings. It would result in a more efficient use of tax dollars. But many Americans are beginning to ask a critical question: Where are the savings?

Massive Reductions, Unclear Results

Among the most significant cutbacks:

Layoffs: Tens of thousands of federal workers across agencies have been laid off or had positions eliminated.
Office Closures: Many government-run facilities have been closed. These include Social Security branch offices and rural USDA outreach centers. This closure reduces accessibility for millions of Americans.
Social Programs Slashed: Legislation was recently passed. As a result, funding for programs like Medicaid and Medicare has been reduced. Food assistance and global humanitarian aid are also affected. Preventive services and outreach initiatives that once supported millions are being dismantled or left underfunded.

These cutbacks, in theory, should have freed up hundreds of billions of dollars from the federal budget. Many believed this money would reduce personal tax burdens. Others thought it would be used to invest in infrastructure or support domestic economic growth.

Yet, for the average citizen, these savings have not become visible.

Where Is the Relief?

If the government is spending less, why aren’t Americans seeing a difference in their tax bills? Why are services harder to access, but costs stay the same — or even rise?

Economists point to several possible explanations:

Redistribution of Savings: Much of the money saved through cutbacks has not been returned to taxpayers. Instead, it has been redirected toward defense spending and border enforcement. There are also tax breaks for corporations and high-income earners.
One-Time Costs of Downsizing: Severance packages, contract terminations, and administrative restructuring often generate short-term costs that offset early savings.
Unseen Long-Term Consequences: Cuts to health and humanitarian programs will result in higher long-term costs. These range from emergency medical care to international instability.

A Shift in Priorities

The Trump Administration has often framed these reductions as a necessary reset. They see it as a chance to shrink government. It is also viewed as an opportunity to re-center American values around individual responsibility and self-reliance. Nonetheless, critics argue that the effects are disproportionately felt by the vulnerable. The elderly and rural communities are significantly affected. Those who rely most on public services are also affected.

Meanwhile, for those expecting an immediate drop in taxes, there is little evidence to support those hopes. The same applies to a boost in services funded by savings.

Conclusion: The Hidden Costs of Cutting

In the end, the administration claims victory in trimming government “fat.” Yet, the benefits of those savings stay largely invisible to the average voter. Instead, Americans are paying the same or more for fewer services. They experience longer wait times and less support.

The promise of efficiency has been delivered, but at a human cost. The American people are still waiting for their return on investment.

🔍 Report: “Cutbacks, Promises, and Missing Payoffs”

1. The Layoff Machine

Estimated decline: Over 275,000 federal civil-sector layoffs have been announced under Trump’s second term—roughly 12% of the 2.4 million workforce—comprising 58,000 confirmed cuts, 76,000 buyouts, and 149,000 planned layoffs en.wikipedia.org.
Net reductions: As of March, the Office of Personnel Management reported a single-quarter decline of about 23,700 jobs. This signifies a 1% drop. The federal workforce has been reduced to approximately 2.29 million reuters.com.
Legal rollback: A federal judge blocked mass layoffs at HHS. The judge deemed them “arbitrary and capricious.” This decision halted over 10,000 planned terminations en.wikipedia.org+3thedailybeast.com+3apnews.com+3.

“The American people deserve a government that is lean. It should be efficient and focused on core priorities,” OPM Acting Director Charles Ezell said. He framed the downsizing as a fiscal win reuters.com+6federalnewsnetwork.com+6foxnews.com+6.

2. Agency-by-Agency Fallout

Health & Human Services: Targeted a 25% workforce reduction—about 20,000 jobs eliminated—affecting the CDC, FDA, NIH, and CMS apnews.com.
National Science Foundation: Paused or canceled 1,600 grants. It slashed fellowships by 75%. It also dismantled peer-review independence—a move scientists warn will cost U.S. innovation and “a generation of talent” theguardian.com.
National Park Service: Permanent staffing fell by 24%. There were only 4,500 seasonal hires, which is far short of the needed 7,700. This resulted in maintenance backlogs and delayed emergency responses staffingindustry.com+3sfgate.com+3govexec.com+3.

3. The Savings That Never Materialized

DOGE’s bold claims: The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced $160 billion in savings. They achieved this via contract cancellations, leases, and workforce cuts en.wikipedia.org+5en.wikipedia.org+5cbsnews.com+5.
Reality check: Independent analysts argue that actual cost reductions are closer to $80 billion, and note caveats:
- ~$135 million lost from disruption.
- Contract “savings” often overstated—e.g., a $655 million USAID contract cut was restated at just 35 cents reuters.com.
Budget context:
- Federal outlays rose by over $200 billion in Trump’s first 100 days. This amount was more than what was spent in nine of the prior ten years.
- Debt-service climbed too: $94 billion in interest payments in one month vs. $80 billion a year earlier reuters.com.
- DOGE’s savings amount to just 2.6% of discretionary spending—effectively negligible overall visualcapitalist.com.

4. Impact on Taxpayers & Services

Despite layoffs:

No direct tax relief for average Americans.
Essential services have been impaired: reduced access for Medicaid/Medicare beneficiaries, eroded scientific research, delayed park maintenance, weakened emergency response.
Budget cuts amount to a drop in the bucket. Mandatory expenditures like Social Security, Medicare, defense, veterans’ benefits, and debt interest consume around two-thirds of the federal budget. sfgate.com+1wsj.com+1.

5. Public Opinion & Potential Fallout

Public sentiment: 55% of Americans believe cuts to federal employees and services will harm the economy; only 31% disagree ourpublicservice.org+1cbsnews.com+1.
Economist takeaway:“To cut federal spending significantly, focus on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Interest spending must also be addressed,” notes AEIs Nat Malkus cbsnews.com.
- Even a 10% workforce cut yields only ~$25 billion per year—less than 1% of total federal outlays investopedia.com.

📊 Summary Table

Cutback Type	Scale of Reduction	Estimated Savings	Caveats / Impact
Federal layoffs	~275,000 announced; ~23k net cut	$25–80 B annually	Disruptive, costly; limited fiscal effect
Agency-specific job cuts	HHS (20k), NSF grants (1.6k), NPS (24%)	Not fully quantified	Services degraded: health, science, park management
DOGE-reported cuts	Claimed $160 B	$80 B real impact?	Misdocuments, redistribution to defense/veteran spending
Overall federal spending	Up $200 B first 100 days	–	Outlays still increasing due to fixed costs and one-off obligations

🧾 Conclusion

The Trump Administration’s aggressive federal cutbacks have certainly shrunk parts of government. Yet, they haven’t translated into noticeable savings for average taxpayers. Most reductions target lower-tier programs instead of trimming the core federal budget. Mandatory spending, including defense, healthcare, pensions, and debt interest, continues unchecked. Meanwhile, disruptions to critical services—public health, national parks, scientific research—have been significant.

Bottom line: The headline of a leaner government resonate politically, but the economic reality for taxpayers is murky—and bleak. Unless cuts touch the big-ticket mandatory spending items, true budget relief remains elusive.

Recent coverage on Trump cutbacks

THE BOTTOM LINE

If you’ve got less than $10,000 in the bank, here’s the truth. You’re not cashing in on any of this. The deals and decisions being made right now will fatten the pockets of the top money makers—not yours.

What you will see is the fallout:

Higher grocery bills
Rising medical costs
More expensive fuel

By year’s end, everything you need will cost more, while your paycheck buys less. The framework isn’t built for you to win—it’s built for you to keep paying. And that is the bottom line!

SOURCES:

Recent coverage on Trump cutbacks;

Recent coverage on Trump cutbacks found at;

reuters.com

How Trump is starting to shape the job market

Today

theguardian.com

Scientists warn US will lose a generation of talent because of Trump cuts

Today

sfgate.com

‘Truly devastating’: National Park Service lost nearly a quarter of permanent workforce

Today

vox.com

Does Trump really not understand his huge bill cuts Medicaid?

Today

CELEBRATION OF LIFE ANNOUNCED FOR COUNTRY LEGEND JEANNIE SEELY

August 13, 2025August 7, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

Jeannie Seely’s 5,398th Opry Show” Set for August 14 at Grand Ole Opry House

1–2 minutes

A public Celebration of Life will honor Grand Ole Opry star and country music icon Jeannie Seely. It will be held Wednesday, August 14 at 10:00 a.m. CT at the Grand Ole Opry House in Nashville. Fittingly titled “Jeannie Seely’s 5,398th Opry Show,” the service will pay tribute to her unmatched legacy.

The event will be broadcast live on 650 AM WSM. It will also be available via livestream at: VIMEO. You can view it live there. Here.

Jeannie Seely passed away on Friday, August 1 at age 85, after complications from an intestinal infection. She held the record for most Opry appearances in history — 5,397 — a milestone unlikely to ever be surpassed.

Tributes from the Country Music Community

Many stars shared heartfelt words:

Ricky Skaggs: “She made nervous newcomers feel at peace. We can all take her lead and encourage the next generation.”
Pam Tillis: “She had grit, wit, talent—and she was cool.”
Larry Gatlin: “She was my champion and inspiration. I miss her already.”
John Anderson, Ray Stevens, Mark Chesnutt, Darryl Worley, Billy Dean, and others echoed similar admiration, love, and deep loss.

Legacy

Nicknamed “Miss Country Soul,” Jeannie Seely broke barriers for women in country music. She was the first woman to regularly host Opry segments. She is also a GRAMMY winner and a BMI-awarded songwriter. Additionally, she has been an Opry member since 1967. Her songs were recorded by legends. These include Merle Haggard, Dottie West, and Willie Nelson. She also shared the screen with Willie Nelson in Honeysuckle Rose. In 2022, she was honored for her historic number of Opry performances. A stretch of road near the venue was renamed the Jeannie Seely Interchange in 2024.

Instead of Flowers

Donations in Jeannie’s name are encouraged to pet-related charities or the Opry Trust Fund: opry.com/about/opry-trust-fund

To start viewing events from Jeannie’s life, visit her website here. You can see the music she shared, events celebrated, and the people she loved.

Going Into A Restricted Area While Wearing Metal – An MRI Nightmare

July 19, 2025July 17, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

A Man Entered An MRI Room That He Was Not Approved To Enter. It Nearly Killed Him.

2–3 minutes

The Necklace That Shouldn’t Have Been Worn: A Tragic MRI Reminder

“Do you have any metal on your body?”

It’s a question you’ve probably heard before entering a medical imaging room. It might sound routine—almost too simple to matter. But as one man in Westbury, New York, learned the hard way, ignoring that question can be deadly.

Earlier this week, a 61-year-old man walked into an MRI suite at Nassau Open MRI. He wasn’t a patient—he was a visitor. And according to reports, he entered without permission, unaware (or perhaps unconcerned) about the danger waiting behind the door.

Around his neck hung a heavy metal necklace.

That necklace would soon become a missile.

As the MRI machine powered up, the magnetic field—a force thousands of times stronger than Earth’s natural magnetism—ripped the necklace forward, pulling the man violently toward the magnet. The result was catastrophic. He suffered critical injuries and was rushed to the hospital.

You can read the full report here from the Miami Herald:

🔗 Visitor wearing necklace critically injured inside New York MRI room

Why This Happened—and Why It Shouldn’t Have

MRI machines are marvels of modern medicine. They allow doctors to see deep into the body without needing to cut it open. Yet, the science that powers them relies on an immense magnetic force.

That’s why medical staff ask the same questions again and again:

Do you have any metal implants?
Are you wearing jewelry?
Have you removed your belt, watch, or hairpin?

These aren’t suggestions. They’re essential precautions to prevent precisely what happened in Westbury.

The necklace that injured this man was an everyday item—something many of us wear without a second thought.

But in the MRI room, it was anything but ordinary.

A Reminder Worth Heeding

This tragic incident serves as a sobering reminder:

Always follow MRI safety guidelines. Always respect warning signs. Never assume a machine like this can be taken lightly.

The man who wore the necklace didn’t mean to cause harm. The laws of physics don’t care about intent. In an MRI suite, metal is never safe unless it’s been declared and cleared.

So next time someone asks you,

“Do you have any metal on your body?”

Don’t shrug it off.

Your answer will save your life!

You can read the full report here from the Miami Herald:

🔗 Visitor wearing necklace critically injured inside New York MRI room

The Grand Canyon Is Not for Sale—Unless Trump Says So

July 18, 2025July 17, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

The last time someone tried to sell the Grand Canyon, it was a scam. This time, it might be federal policy.

6–9 minutes

Developers Eye Grand Canyon’s North Rim

There is a quiet discussion about the concern. People are worried about the destruction of the structures at the Grand Canyon’s North Rim area. Especially if you mention whether Trump will arrange the sale of the property to an investor. Some prospective property companies are considering this, and they have shown interest in the area since it burned last week. The Sale Is –– Not Likely!

It’s doubtful that the U.S. government (i.e., the National Park Service, which manages Grand Canyon National Park) will sell off the burned North Rim properties to private investors. BUT there are always an exception!

“Selling the Canyon: What If the North Rim Was for Sale?”

Private investors will rebuild the lost structures by purchasing the property and assuming control of the North Rim. This would take the burden off the Federal Government. Additionally, it would bring a commercial attraction to the area, increasing yearly traffic compared to the current level.

_{^{Photo by Gizem Gu00f6kce on Pexels.com}}

We have seen with the Trump Administration that the members of his office do not adhere to general practices. These practices are important to ethical principles. They are not below ignoring court orders, laws, and regulations to do what they please. The Administration can obtain anything it asks for with the current House, Senate, and Supreme Court. If Trump asks for a clear title for the Grand Canyon Properties, he would get one. He wipes it from the National Historical Places Monuments list. He removes select pieces of property from the protections of the National Park System.

Don’t think he would, or should? Try stopping renaming a Military Base after a Civil War figure from the Confederacy. Try stopping a military parade on his birthday. Try stopping him from cutting medical insurance coverage for millions of Americans. Inform him that everyone is entitled to civil liberties and must be permitted due process through a legal hearing.

Then, say selling off property in a National Park will never happen. Many do not believe the House and Senate will support Trump’s actions. They will not give him the papers he needs. This includes doing what he wants with the smoldering remains of the North Rim. It also affects any National Park.

🇺🇸 Enter the Trump Administration

Federal law strictly prohibits the sale of national park lands. Nonetheless, recent administrations—especially under Donald Trump—have shown a willingness to test those boundaries. Presidential influence has set a precedent for reshaping public lands policy. Protections in Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante have been reduced. Formerly protected lands have been opened to oil and gas leases. The Trustee of the National Land and Parks Service will face a force from the Trump Administration. Survival is uncertain if Trump and Company aim to dismantle it.

Sources close to high-level real estate firms claim interest has spiked since the North Rim Lodge was destroyed. The timing has raised questions among environmentalists. They wonder if the destruction of federal structures paves the way. An administration unconcerned with precedent or preservation will try a land transfer.

🏛️ Legal Hurdles (and How They Might Be Circumvented)

Legally, the sale of Grand Canyon National Park land is almost impossible under existing statutes. Some fear the standard rules no longer apply. This fear arises from a cooperative Congress. Additionally, an activist Supreme Court and a President with a record of executive overreach contribute to this concern.

There are those close to the Canyon who are saying – “It’s unlikely, but not unimaginable. In 2020, no one thought sacred tribal lands would be opened to mining. Yet it happened. If political winds shift hard enough, even the Grand Canyon is not be safe from the bulldozer.”

Speaking for the Nay side.

Why a sale isn’t feasible:

There are several points to consider. These points explain why the sale of land owned by the Park Service would not transfer to private ownership. This is due to certain reasons and should be considered. Anyone wishing to ought to consider them further.

The North Rim Is Part of a National Park
The North Rim once included the Lodge, cabins, ranger headquarters, and other structures. It is now part of a federally protected unit of the National Park System. That land is held in trust for the public and can’t be sold or transferred to private ownership.
The area is of Historic and Cultural Significance (does it matter?)
The Grand Canyon Lodge was designated a National Historic Landmark in 1982. It was also listed on the National Register of Historic Places (1). Federal law prevents the disposal of such historic properties without a formal and rare delisting process—something that’s practically unheard of.
Park Policy and Public Trust Doctrine now objects to sale or misuse of property.
The NPS mission requires preserving federal land for future generations. Selling land—even after a disaster—is contrary to this mission and the principles of public trust.
Federal Law on Disposal (would have to be changed.)
Federal agencies must prove the land is excess under laws like the Property Act. The Federal Lands & Policy Management Act also requires this. They must prepare environmental assessments. Agencies must also undergo public notice and comment before any disposal occurs. That’s a lengthy, bureaucratic process—and it rarely results in the sale of park lands.

What’s likely to happen instead:

Reconstruction & Restoration
Park officials and the State of Arizona are more focused on fire investigation. Governor Katie Hobbs is pushing for accountability. There is emphasis on environmental remediation and rebuilding. The North Rim will be closed for the rest of the 2025 season (2).
Congressional/Agency Funding
Efforts now will center on securing federal and state funding to rebuild the Lodge, cabins, ranger facilities, and other infrastructure.
Fire Response Review
Investigations are underway into the decision to let the Dragon Bravo Fire burn before it exploded. Arizona’s government has demanded a thorough, independent review (3).

^{_{Photo by Kurt Hudspeth on Pexels.com}}

In short:

The burned structures are integral parts of Grand Canyon National Park—they’re not eligible for sale. Instead, the focus will be on recovery, restoration, and rebuilding what was lost, all within the park’s management framework.

Nevertheless, I reserve this statement. We have observed this with the Trump Administration. The members of his office do not adhere to general practices that are germane to ethical principles. They are not below ignoring court orders, laws, and regulations to do what they please. The current House and Senate, along with the Supreme Court, support the Administration. This means the Administration can obtain anything it asks for. If Trump asks for a clear title for the Grand Canyon Properties, he would get one.

Editor’s Note:

I’ve always had something like a sixth sense—premonitions, you can call them. Strangely, the ones I write about never seem to come true. It’s the ones I keep to myself that have a way of becoming reality. – Peace!

On July 17th, a report came out from an Arizona Television News Outlet. The report identified the location as GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK, AZ (AZFamily). Arizona’s Family learned a crucial member of the crew was not called in promptly to help. The Dragon Bravo Fire blew up and burned dozens of buildings over the weekend.

As of Thursday, there is still no containment of the wildfire at the Grand Canyon’s North Rim. Six hundred firefighters are working to put out the flames. The wildfire has grown to more than 11,000 acres.

Meteorologists are key to fire management. The Dragon Bravo Fire didn’t have one on scene until Monday. This was several days after the damage was done.

It adds to concerns about how the fire was handled after being sparked by lightning on the Fourth of July. In this case, aside from the actual flames, the weather played a significant role in the destruction.

Strong winds blew up from within the canyon and fanned the flames. Crews on the ground didn’t have an incident meteorologist with them over the weekend. This expert have been capable of warn them ahead of time.

For days, the National Park Service took a “confine and contain” approach. They allowed flames to consume the underbrush. At the same time, they protected the structures within the national park. Nonetheless, that changed on July 11. Firefighters reported that “strong northwest wind gusts were uncommon to the area. These winds jumped multiple containment features.”

Ultimately, the result was more than 70 structures destroyed by flames, including the historic lodge.

The entire report can be found by visiting here.

From the Pages of History: July 11, 1955 — “Nightfall Over Wichita”

July 11, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

1–2 minutes

Wichita, Kansas – July 11, 1955

The heat had been unrelenting for days. By the evening of July 11th, something darker than the weather was brewing in the Kansas sky. Just after 6:30 p.m., local news reports began buzzing with concern. A fast-moving system was developing west of the city. Radar, still new technology for military meteorologists, was showing rotation in those days it wasn’t shared like it is now.

At 7:04 p.m., a Category F4 tornado touched down near the town of Udall, Kansas. It was the same town that had been devastated just two months earlier in the deadliest tornado in state history. This one skirted the more populated areas. Still, damage was widespread. Barns were flattened, power lines twisted, and wheat fields scraped bare. Miraculously, only minor injuries were reported. Many locals said they were prepared this time, keeping radios on and basements cleared after the trauma of May 25.

The Wichita Eagle published a late edition the next morning. The headline read

“Twister Brushes Wichita – City Spared, Farms Not So Lucky.”

A black-and-white photo captured a twisted silo lying like a crushed can under a red-orange sunrise.

Looking back, July 11, 1955, was a reminder that in the American Midwest, nature rarely knocks. It kicks in the door, and you learn to be ready.

There Are Different Ways To Preserve America’s Freedom – We Are Taught Lessons From The Past

July 4, 2025Benjamin2 Comments

The Day the Flag Stood Still: The Forgotten Fourth of July on Wake Island, 1942

On July 4, 1942, Americans back home celebrated Independence Day with cookouts and parades. Meanwhile, a small group of American civilian contractors and U.S. Navy personnel held a defiant but somber celebration under Japanese captivity on a tiny Pacific atoll called Wake Island.

Just months earlier, in December 1941, Wake Island had made headlines when a handful of U.S. Marines, Navy men, and civilian construction workers miraculously repelled a much larger Japanese force. This was one of the only successful defenses during the early days of World War II. But eventually, Wake fell. Hundreds of Americans were captured and held as prisoners.

Despite their grim reality, the spirit of independence didn’t die. On July 4, 1942, many had celebrated the day at home a year prior. A group of prisoners marked the holiday. They secretly stitched together a makeshift American flag from scraps of clothing and parachute fabric. They hid it under a floorboard in their barracks. That night, after roll call, they quietly raised the flag. It was up for just a few moments. That was long enough for the men to salute it and whisper a rendition of “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

The penalty for such defiance was death. For those men, risking their lives to honor the flag was worth it. The freedom it stood for—even behind enemy lines—justified their risk.

The flag was never discovered. The war ended in 1945. One of the surviving POWs smuggled the flag fragment home. He had sewn it into the lining of his jacket. It now resides in a museum in Kansas as a silent but powerful witness to patriotism under pressure.

Closing Thought:

Freedom isn’t always loud. It isn’t always celebrated with sparklers and song. Sometimes, it’s whispered in the dark. Saluted in secret. Hidden beneath the floorboards. And yet, even in those moments, it shines just as bright.

The Rebirth of Santa Barbara: From Ruin to Renewal

June 30, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

1–2 minutes

Dawn of Ruin and Renewal

The early morning calm in Santa Barbara was shattered at 6:23 a.m. when the earth quaked mightily beneath the coastal city. Buildings shuddered, bricks rained from rooftops, and the streets trembled underfoot. In those precious dawn hours, life had yet to stir—and that spared many. By daybreak, the death toll stood at a modest 13 souls, considering the scale of devastation (1).

Amid the wreckage, sailors from the USS Arkansas joined local workers to dig for survivors. They waded through rubble, their uniforms dusty and stained, hauling beams and calling out names. Looters probed the ruins for valuables, but guards—both Navy and civilian—kept vigilant watch (2).

Yet even as remnants of the old city lay in ruin, a vision for rebirth emerged. Spearheaded by Pearl Chase and other civic leaders, a movement to rebuild in a unified Spanish Colonial style began. The reconstruction led to enduring landmarks. It produced the iconic Santa Barbara County Courthouse, soon hailed as among America’s most beautiful public buildings (3).

Santa Barbara’s quiet elegance faced destruction in one fateful dawn. But the very next dawn laid the foundations of something more beautiful. The earthquake didn’t just shake buildings—it awakened a city’s spirit, forging an architectural legacy that stands to this day.

DONKEY MILK – YOUR NEXT BIG SUPERFOOD AND SKINCARE CRAZE! HEE HAW. SERIOUS!

June 9, 2025June 9, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

https://worldcrop.wordpress.com/2025/05/20/donkey-milk-natures-dunky-farming-higest-income/?page_id=159

There is talk about the next big craze. Is it real? According to the report, yes!

Donkey Milk has plenty of nutrients and more! Visit the World Farmer Story to learn more!

Learn About The Lady In Mickey Gilley’s Song – The Girls All Get Better At Closing Time.

May 17, 2025May 17, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

‘I know Robert Redford, even Lola Hall…’

4–6 minutes

Lola Hall: Oklahoma’s Weather Girl Who Became a Legend

In the heart of America, television was becoming the central storyteller of the modern household. During this time, one woman in Oklahoma City quietly became a beloved figure. She was cherished across living rooms, farms, and small-town diners alike. Her name was Lola Hall, the poised and personable weather girl for KWTV Channel 9. Through the 1960s and 1970s, Lola transitioned from forecasting the weather. She began anchoring the morning news. She carved out a legacy of warmth, professionalism, and unexpected celebrity.

A Humble Start on Channel 9

Lola Hall wasn’t born into the limelight. She was raised in Oklahoma. She considered herself an ordinary woman. “I’m just a plain girl with a good work ethic,” she once said. She never imagined she would become a fixture in households across the state. She also didn’t foresee that her name would one day be immortalized in a hit country song.

She started at KWTV in the early 1960s. Television was still finding its footing then. Local personalities were becoming stars in their own right. Initially billed as a “weather girl,” a common term at the time, Lola did more. She did more than point at cloud symbols and smile at the camera. She brought a genuine understanding of weather patterns. Her calm demeanor during storms was notable. She had a natural charisma that made viewers trust her.

*^{_{The Weather Girl also known as the Weather Lady, and Lola Hall}}*

Lola quickly stood out not only for her delivery but for her grounded, approachable nature. She didn’t talk down to viewers or play a character. She was simply Lola — smart, steady, and relatable.

Rising to Anchor the Morning News

As her popularity grew, so did her responsibilities. By the early 1970s, Lola earned a promotion to co-anchor the morning news. This was a significant achievement for a woman in broadcasting. In that early morning slot, she became the face viewers saw as they sipped coffee. People watched her while packing school lunches. They prepared for long days on the farm or at work.

Her calm voice and natural empathy helped set the tone for the day. But it wasn’t a solo act.

Near the end of her career, she welcomed two of Oklahoma’s most trusted newsmen. Bill Haire and Wayne Lyle joined her on the morning show. Both were widely respected for their skill in agricultural reporting — essential content for Oklahoma’s large farming population. The trio became a necessary part of daily life for rural viewers. Farmers tuned in for weather and headlines. They also relied on Bill and Wayne for dependable reports on crop forecasts. Their reports covered market conditions and farming trends.

Lola, Bill, and Wayne worked together to form an Oklahoma morning news trifecta. They delivered information with clarity, sincerity, and a deep respect for their audience. They weren’t just broadcasters; they were neighbors.

A Country Music Cameo

But, Lola’s story wouldn’t be finished without an interesting twist. One of her career’s most surprising moments was an unexpected brush with country music fame.

_{^{Lola Hall, KWTV Channel 9′s beloved weather girl and morning news anchor, pictured during a 1970s broadcast. Her calm presence and signature charm made her a household name across Oklahoma.}}

During an interview with country star Mickey Gilley, Lola found herself momentarily flustered. Gilley, known for chart-topping hits and honky-tonk swagger, was in Oklahoma City promoting his music when he confessed on air.

He told Lola that back in his younger days, he grew up in rural east Texas. KWTV Channel 9 was one of the few stations they could pick up. And Lola Hall, with her grace and good looks, was a celebrity to the local boys.

“You were the hottest thing we’d ever seen,”

Gilley smiled, adding that Lola had made such an impression that he mentioned her by name in his song.

“The Girls All Get Prettier at Closing Time.”

For a brief moment, Lola lost her composure — laughing, blushing, and turning to the crew off-camera. It was a rare crack in her usually calm exterior, and viewers loved it. She quickly recovered, continuing the interview with her usual charm, but later admitted she was shocked.

“I thought I was just the girl telling them to grab an umbrella,”

She joked.

A Lasting Legacy

Lola Hall stepped away from the news desk eventually. She left behind a legacy built not on flash or fame. Instead, it was built on trust, relatability, and professionalism. During an era when women in broadcasting often had to work twice as hard, Lola rose through the ranks. Her long-lasting connection with viewers stood as a quiet revolution.

She may never have considered herself glamorous. She may not have thought of herself as remarkable. But, to thousands of Oklahomans—and at least one country legend—she was both.

You know it each time you hear the song and Gilley sings the line,

“I know Robert Redford even Lola Hall!”

Lola Hall wasn’t just the weather girl. She was part of the fabric of Oklahoma life. Her name, her voice, and her smile are still remembered by those who welcomed her into their homes each morning.

For a personal take on her career click here and be taken to an interview with Lola Hall!

To truly dive into the story of Lola Hall and other trailblazing women of the 1950s and ’60s, prepare yourself. They were often known then as “weather girls.” Grab your favorite refreshment and settle in. This captivating podcast offers a rich glimpse into their rise to popularity. Back in the day, we just called it a recording—but whatever the name, you’re in for something special.

Grassroots Movement Transforms American Politics

March 23, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

3–4 minutes

The Grassroots Movement for Economic and Political Justice

Arizona Rally March 2025 — _{^{Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez mark a defining moment in American politics. Tempe, Arizona Rally 2025 Groff Media©}}

The recent rallies by Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez mark a defining moment in contemporary American politics. Across five rallies in three states, tens of thousands gathered. They made a resounding call for change. This signals widespread dissatisfaction with the current political and economic systems. The overwhelming attendance at these events reveals a deep-rooted movement. It is fueled by a demand for economic fairness. There is also a call for political integrity and grassroots-driven reform.

One of the key takeaways from these rallies is the rejection of Trumpism, oligarchy, and authoritarianism. The presence of thousands in North Las Vegas, Tempe, Greeley, Denver, and Tucson shows collective opposition to massive income inequality. Wealth inequality has left many working-class Americans behind. This movement directly responds to a political system. In this system, billionaires hold disproportionate power. They use their wealth to influence elections and dictate policy. The rallies were not simply campaign events; they were gatherings of individuals. They were determined to reclaim democracy from corporate interests. They also wanted to challenge political elites.

Moreover, the movement echoes historical struggles that have shaped the United States. Sanders draws parallels between this modern fight and past movements that have successfully challenged oppression. These include the abolitionist, labor, civil rights, and women’s rights movements. These historical precedents offer a blueprint for today’s progressive movement. They emphasize that real change arises when ordinary people organize. Real change occurs when they take action against systemic injustice.

A critical part of this movement is grassroots organization. Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez stress the need to mobilize people in all 50 states through consistent engagement. Mobilizing thousands of people means not only attending rallies but also translating that enthusiasm into political action. Encouraging progressives to run for office at all levels is crucial. This includes positions from school boards to state legislatures. It is a core strategy to enact lasting change. Local elections, often overlooked in the national political discourse, hold immense power in shaping policies that affect daily life.

Additionally, the movement extends beyond electoral politics. It calls for strong communities where people support one another despite economic and social challenges. The emphasis on solidarity reflects the understanding that political change is inseparable from fostering a culture of mutual aid. It also involves building collective strength. The movement creates networks of engaged citizens. The goal is to counteract the feelings of loneliness that many experience in today’s economic landscape. It also addresses feelings of helplessness.

This movement does not overstate the urgency. Sanders highlights the significance of this moment not only for current generations but also for future ones. Climate change, economic disparity, and political corruption are existential issues that need immediate action. The message is clear: now is the time for mobilization, not despair. The fight for a fair and just society depends on ordinary people. They must be willing to challenge entrenched power structures. They must demand a system that works for all.

The rallies led by Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez signify a pivotal moment in U.S. politics, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction with inequality and a demand for economic justice. — _{^{Arizona, Nevada, Colorado,}}

In conclusion, the rallies held across Nevada, Arizona, and Colorado exemplify the strength of a growing progressive movement in America. The record-breaking turnouts illustrate a profound discontent with the status quo and a wish for systemic change. By organizing, running for office, and building community solidarity, this movement can redefine the future of American democracy. The path ahead is not easy. History has shown that when people unite for justice, they can overcome even the most powerful obstacles.

George Kalinsky A Man Of Pictures 1936-2025

January 17, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

1–2 minutes

A Man Of Pictures 1936-2025 George Kalinsky Obituary — _{^{George Kalinsky}}

George Kalinsky was born in 1936 in Hempstead, New York. He was a renowned American photographer. His work captured some of the most iconic moments in sports and entertainment history. Finding Aids

His photography journey began serendipitously in the mid-1960s. He noticed Muhammad Ali entering the 5th Street Gym while on vacation in Miami. Intrigued, Kalinsky followed and was allowed to photograph Ali after a brief exchange with trainer Angelo Dundee. These images marked the start of his illustrious career. Interview Magazine

In 1966, Kalinsky became the official photographer for Madison Square Garden, a position he held for nearly six decades. He documented over 10,000 events throughout his tenure. He captured legendary figures like Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley, and Pope John Paul II. His work has been featured in major publications like Sports Illustrated, People, Newsweek, and The New York Times. Kalinsky authored ten books. His photographs were exhibited in esteemed institutions, including the Museum of Modern Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. – From The Lens of George Kalinsky

Over the years, Kalinsky has received many accolades for his contributions to photography. In 2001, the PhotoImaging Manufacturers and Distributors Association named him International Photographer of the Year. He was inducted into the New York City Basketball Hall of Fame in 2010. He received the Pratt Institute’s Legends Award in 2017. Wikipedia

George Kalinsky passed away on January 16, 2025, at the age of 88. His legacy endures through the timeless images he captured. These images continue to inspire. They evoke memories of significant moments in sports and entertainment history. Wikipedia

Sources

Special Air Mission 39: A Tribute to President Carter

January 7, 2025January 7, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

3–4 minutes

The sun broke over the Air Force Base in Atlanta, Georgia. It cast golden hues across the tarmac as Special Air Mission 39 waited. Its polished surface gleamed in the light. The presidential seal on its side served as a solemn reminder of the journey it was about to undertake. Inside, a reverent hush filled the cabin. The crew prepared for their most crucial passenger. It was a man whose life had been dedicated to service, humility, and unwavering commitment—President Jimmy Carter.

From his earliest days at the Naval Academy, James Earl Carter Jr. was shaped by discipline, honor, and an unrelenting drive to do his best. Those who knew him often remarked on his quiet determination. His former Navy colleagues remember him as a man of integrity, always putting the welfare of his team first. Carter navigated the complexities of submarine systems in the Navy with steady resolve. He also tackled global issues from the Oval Office with the same determination.

The engines roared to life for Special Air Mission 39. This was what President Carter had once known as Air Force One. At that moment, the memory of his long journey sharpened. Memories of his enduring journey came into sharp focus. Here was a man who had never sought power for power’s sake but had wielded it to uplift others. In the years after his presidency, Carter’s service reverberated across communities. He built homes for people experiencing homelessness. He mediated peace in war-torn nations. Additionally, he battled disease through the Carter Center. His legacy was not confined to history books but lived on in the lives he had touched.

The flight crew gathered for a moment of silence before departure. Captain Emily Harrington, a seasoned pilot who had long admired Carter, addressed her team.

“Today, we honor not just a president but a man who believed in the power of service. Let’s give him the journey he deserves.”

As the plane ascended, the passengers—family, close friends, and select members of his administration—reflected on his unwavering faith and commitment. Rosalynn, his beloved late wife, was his partner for more than seven decades. She was waiting for him at their Plains, Georgia home. She also waited in Jimmy’s heart, where their journey had begun. Jimmy would be back. He had business in D.C. to take care of first. President Carter would fly there with the family. He would lay in state at the Capital Rotunda. He would attend a state memorial service. Later in the week, he would return to Plains, Georgia. He would be laid next to Rosalynn at their place of burial.

The flight path traced the arc of his life. It went over the rural farmlands of Georgia. The soil there had nurtured his love for community and the values of hard work and compassion. The Naval Academy in Annapolis, where young Jimmy had set the course for a lifetime of service. Over Washington, D.C., where he had walked into the presidency with a promise to lead with integrity.

As SAM 39 descended, the crowd gathered below to pay their respects. They came not just to honor a president. They came to honor a man who had reminded the world that authentic leadership lies in humility. True leadership also involves an unwavering commitment to doing what is right.

The plane touched down with grace, its engines whispering to a stop. The door opened, and the honor guard stepped ahead to carry Carter to the Rotunda. The air was heavy with gratitude, sorrow, and pride. A man who had given so much of himself had completed the second leg of his journey. There was only one more leg left in the final part of his last journey.

In the quiet stillness of that moment, a quote from Carter’s own words have echoed in the hearts of all there:

“My faith demands that I do whatever I can, wherever I can, whenever I can, for as long as I can, with whatever I have, to try to make a difference.”

Quote Reference: Congratulations Jimmy Carter – Bryan Strawser. http://bryanstrawser.com/2002/10/congratulations-jimmy-c/

The Sunday School President – THAT THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT WASTED AND IGNORED.

January 5, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

2–3 minutes

A warm Sunday morning in Plains, Georgia seemed tailor-made for reflection. At the Maranatha Baptist Church, a small congregation gathered in quiet anticipation. This wasn’t an ordinary Sunday service—it was one led by Jimmy Carter, the 39th President of the United States.

Even decades after leaving the White House, Carter stayed true to the values that shaped his life. These values were faith, humility, and service. Carter taught Sunday School to anyone who wanted to listen every Sunday that he was capable. Visitors from all over the world made the pilgrimage to Plains. Some traveled thousands of miles to hear wisdom. This wisdom was not shared in a grand hall. Instead, it was delivered in a modest church that held no more than a couple hundred people.

Jimmy Carter, then in his 90s, shuffled to the front of the sanctuary, a quiet determination in his step. He greeted the crowd with a humble smile, his voice steady and welcoming. His lesson was simple yet profound: loving your neighbor, no matter their background or beliefs.

“When Jesus said to love your neighbor,”

Carter explained, his blue eyes twinkling,

“He didn’t put any conditions on it. He didn’t say only if they look like you or vote like you. He meant everyone.”

The audience was a mix of locals and travelers. They hung on his every word. Their hearts and minds were stirred by the profound simplicity of his message. The room was filled with a palpable sense of awe. This was not due to the titles Carter once held. Instead, it was because of his unwavering commitment to living the values he taught.

When the lesson ended, Carter didn’t rush off. Instead, he stayed to shake hands, take photos, and share stories. These personal moments hold the most significant importance for him. He listened as much as he spoke. This is especially meaningful for a man who had once navigated the complexities of global politics.

One visitor, a young man from Chicago, nervously approached.

“President Carter, what made you keep teaching Sunday School after everything you’ve accomplished?”

Carter smiled warmly.

“I’ve been a farmer, a naval officer, a governor, and a president. But teaching Sunday School reminds me of who I truly am—a servant of God. Titles come and go, but the love we share with others lasts forever.”

That was Jimmy Carter. He believed that service didn’t end with a term in office. He thought that humility wasn’t weakness. Even the simplest acts of kindness can ripple through the world. For Carter, life’s most outstanding achievement wasn’t in power or prestige. It was in the quiet and steady work of lifting others up. He demonstrated this belief through his work with Habitat for Humanity. He also promoted peace and human rights. Additionally, he was committed to public service long after his presidency.

As the church emptied, a sense of peace lingered in the air. This was a testament to the legacy of a man who lived his faith with every breath.

Sunday school class with Jimmy Carter: What it was like

THE LAST RIDE FOR THE MAN FROM PLAINS GEORGIA

January 4, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

2–3 minutes

In the early hours of January 4, 2025, a somber hush fell over the rolling plains of Georgia. The sun shone gently over the landscape. A motorcade departed from Phoebe Sumter Medical Center in Americus. It bore the flag-draped casket of the 39th President of the United States, Jimmy Carter. The journey marked the start of a six-day tribute. It honored a man who dedicated his life to service, peace, and humanity.

The procession moved through Carter’s hometown of Plains, passing by his boyhood home in Archery. Here, the old farm bell tolled 39 times. Each chime resonated with the years he had served as the nation’s leader. It symbolized each year of his presidency. Family members, including his children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, accompanied the casket, their faces reflecting both sorrow and pride. Former Secret Service agents had once protected him. They now served as pallbearers. They honored their final duty to the man they had revered.

Along the route, admirers gathered. Some held flowers. Others wore commemorative pins. They were all united in their wish to pay homage to a beloved figure. The motorcade continued to Atlanta. There, Carter’s body would lie in repose at the Carter Presidential Center. This arrangement provided the public with the opportunity to offer their respects.

On January 7, the casket will be transported to Washington, D.C., where President Carter will lie in state at the U.S. Capitol. A state funeral is scheduled for January 9 at the Washington National Cathedral. Dignitaries will honor his legacy there, including President Joe Biden. The funeral will be a solemn event. There will be a military honor guard. A close family member will deliver a eulogy.

Carter’s journey will reach its conclusion after the national ceremonies. He will return to Plains, Georgia, for a private funeral service at Maranatha Baptist Church. He will be laid to rest beside his beloved wife, Rosalynn. This is the place where his remarkable journey began. It would now conclude there.

As the week unfolds, the nation will ponder on the life of a president who remained a humble servant. Jimmy Carter’s final ride is not just a passage from life to death. It is a testament to a legacy that will endure in the hearts of the people he has touched. This marks the end of a remarkable journey.

The Nation Honors Former President and man Jimmy Carter!

References:

New York Post

Former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral procession begins in Georgia

Today

Politico

Jimmy Carter’s 6-day state funeral begins with a motorcade through south Georgia

Today

AP News

Jimmy Carter’s flag-draped casket is on its way to Atlanta as the 39th president’s state funeral begins

Today