CBS Television: Slowly Dimming the Lights on a Broadcasting Legacy

May 23, 2026May 23, 2026BenjaminLeave a comment

Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures

May 23, 2026

The Lights Are Fading at CBS Television

For years, programs like the television series FBI, NCIS, and Elsbeth built loyal audiences by offering dependable storytelling and familiar characters. Recently, however, some longtime viewers have expressed frustration not necessarily with the shows themselves, but with broader concerns surrounding the direction and management of CBS and CBS News.

CBS News evening news ratings have struggled in 2026. Reports indicate the network’s nightly news audience has remained well behind competitors at ABC and NBC, with several weeks falling below 4 million viewers.
Industry analysts have noted that some CBS entertainment programs are seeing softer live ratings compared to prior seasons, especially among traditional broadcast audiences. Elsbeth has been described by ratings analysts as one of CBS’s weaker live-viewed scripted programs, relying more heavily on delayed streaming audiences.
While flagship franchises like NCIS and FBI remain successful enough to receive renewals, overall network dominance has weakened. Industry reports suggest NBC may surpass CBS in total seasonal broadcast viewers for the first time in over a decade.
Online viewer commentary increasingly reflects frustration with corporate leadership decisions at CBS and Paramount rather than criticism of the actors or writing themselves. Viewer comments attached to ratings articles frequently mention distrust or dissatisfaction with network management decisions influencing their viewing habits.

Among certain audiences, that dissatisfaction appears to be spilling over into entertainment programming, with some viewers choosing to step away from the network altogether. Whether fair or not, perception matters in television, and public trust in a network can influence how audiences respond to its scripted content.

Shows like NCIS, FBI, and Elsbeth still deliver solid performances and experienced casts, but there is growing evidence that audience frustration with the direction of CBS and CBS News is beginning to affect viewer loyalty across the network. Ratings reports show CBS losing ground in several key areas, while online discussion increasingly centers on dissatisfaction with management decisions rather than the shows themselves. Whether temporary or long-term, the network appears to be facing a growing disconnect with part of its traditional audience.

The casts and production teams behind these programs continue delivering polished work, but viewer impressions of corporate leadership and news operations are increasingly becoming part of the conversation surrounding the network’s prime-time lineup.

Viewers continue to drift away, switching off the network in search of outlets they believe are more trustworthy and reliable. For many longtime television audiences, the situation feels like the fading of a legacy once defined by credibility and journalistic strength. One can only imagine pioneers like Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow looking on with disappointment at what many viewers believe CBS has become

Groff Media ©2026 benandsteve.com Truth Endures

When the Press Begins to Look Over Its Shoulder

March 12, 2026May 6, 2026Benjamin3 Comments

There comes a time when you have to draw a line and decide what you stand for. Because if you don’t stand for something, sooner or later you’ll fall for anything.

March 12, 2026

This week I made the next announcement:

“I have made the decision to stop any association with content connected to CBS, CBS News, CNN, FOX, and Flipboard. I can no longer, in good conscience, republish material from these organizations. I also can’t promote content from organizations that use media in ways I find troubling.“

A Change in Direction

There are moments in history when small events start to reveal a much larger shift. What has been happening inside major American media organizations lately is one of those moments. Stephen Colbert is a prominent public voice. He finds himself at the center of controversy shortly after openly criticizing corporate decisions tied to network leadership. This situation naturally raises questions. Is outspoken criticism still welcome within the walls of the companies that broadcast it?

At the same time, reports of internal conflict surrounding the newsroom at 60 Minutes have emerged. These reports involve one of the most respected investigative news teams in television. They have only deepened those concerns. Leadership changes have occurred. Public statements from newsroom figures have surfaced. Accounts of staff unease suggest that journalists inside the organization are feeling pressures. These pressures extend beyond the simple business of reporting the news.

This is where the issue becomes larger than one show, one host, or even one network. The concern is about the atmosphere surrounding journalism itself. When reporters start to sense that pursuing certain stories will carry professional consequences, the chilling effect spreads quickly. Investigative reporting depends on courage, independence, and the understanding that truth—not corporate comfort or political pressure—guides editorial decisions.

My declaration about stepping away from redistributing material from major outlets is rooted in this concern. It is not an attack on journalism. In fact, it is the opposite. It is a defense of what journalism is supposed to be. A free press only remains free when reporters and editors can pursue facts without intimidation. They must be capable of chasing stories without fear of reprisal. Reporters should not have to wonder whether the story they are chasing will upset powerful interests behind the scenes.

Journalists should never have to look over their shoulder before telling the truth. If they do, the public will lose more than just a few television programs. They will also lose newspaper columns. We will lose something far more important. We will lose the ability to trust someone. Somewhere, someone is still willing to ask the hard questions.

History teaches us that the erosion of press freedom rarely begins with a dramatic announcement. It usually starts quietly—with a decision here, a resignation there, a story that suddenly feels too risky to pursue. The public does not notice at first. But journalists do. They feel the shift in the air long before anyone else sees it. When reporters question if the truth cost them their platform, the damage has begun. They question if it risks their career or the support of their newsroom. This damage shows that fear is overshadowing press freedom. My decision to step back from amplifying certain media outlets is not born from anger. It is born from concern. A healthy democracy depends on journalists who can pursue facts without fear. If the press ever needs to seek permission to reveal the truth, the public will suffer. This greater loss impacts more than just a television program or a headline. We will have lost our watchdog.

It is up to us. The average Joe. To start doing something. What will you do?

3 responses to “When the Press Begins to Look Over Its Shoulder”

Hazel

March 12, 2026

It’s one of my concerns, too. The job of journalists and reporters becomes risky now. They’re not safe if they tell the truth, especially since powerful people are involved in it. I don’t know about news these days if it’s true or just be polished to protect someone else. The media becomes chaotic, as well as politics. I don’t understand, and I dislike to hear something disgusting about it.

Reply
1. Benjamin
  
  March 12, 2026
  
  Thank you, Hazel. Many people are torn between speaking up or staying quiet and hoping things change. But dust doesn’t move unless someone disturbs it. Sometimes the only way to slow what’s happening is to challenge it. If my words inspire even one person to act, and that person inspires another, then they have done their job.
  
  Reply
  1. Hazel
    
    March 12, 2026
    
    Yeah. Hopefully some are courageous enough to speak and make a change. We’ll never know. My pleasure, Benjamin. Healing vibes to you.

What you leave today becomes someone’s answer tomorrow.Cancel reply

Lessons from the Last Broadcast: Questioning the Airwaves

October 4, 2025September 4, 2025BenjaminLeave a comment

1–2 minutes

The Last Broadcast

Sam Delaney had been a radio man his whole life. Station manager, on-air talent, janitor when needed—he had done it all. Now, in his seventies, he sat in the empty control room of what was once a bustling AM station. The place smelled of dust and warm circuitry. The walls hummed with silence.

Sam still knew every button by heart. Especially the one marked EBS—Emergency Broadcast System. Back in the day, the FCC’s rules were clear: tones were sacred. The piercing signal wasn’t just a sound; it was a promise. Tornado warnings. Flood alerts. The nation’s line of defense against panic. There had been rules—Title 47 of the CFR, etched into his memory like scripture.

But things had changed. With each new administration, the guardrails loosened. The equal-time law that once kept political chatter balanced had vanished decades ago. A president erased it. He feared his old Hollywood reels would force TV stations to give airtime to his critics. One law changed, and suddenly the airwaves were open territory—bluster, bias, and one-sided noise pumping into homes unchallenged.

Now Sam watched as networks ran those same tones he once revered, but not for weather or disaster. They tested loyalty. They triggered crowds into a frenzy. They commanded obedience in ways he never imagined. Once, tones meant safety. Now, they meant control.

He rubbed the crease in his neck where headphones had rested for thirty years. Outside, the town he had called home was no longer united. Neighbors didn’t trust neighbors. Families split along the fault lines of which voice on the radio they listened to.

Sam leaned into the old microphone. The ON AIR light flickered.

“What if I told you,”

He began. His voice was gravel but steady.

“The lie isn’t in what you’re hearing. It’s in what you stopped questioning.”

He paused, finger hovering over the tone button.

For the first time in his career, he considered sending out a tone. This was not to warn people of a storm but to warn them of themselves.

How Ultra-Processed Foods Consumed the American Diet

September 8, 2024BenjaminLeave a comment

Today, ultra-processed foods dominate the American food supply, making up over half of an American adult’s diet and two-thirds of an American child’s diet despite links to poor health.

Even as those numbers are likely to increase, and food technology develops at lightning speed, U.S. agencies have seemed to lag behind in updating the rules that regulate these foods compared to other countries.

CBS Reports examines why ultra-processed foods have become so pervasive in the American diet – and what filling the gaps in federal regulation can do to ensure Americans are fed and healthy.

Watch Ultra Processed: How Food Tech Consumed the American Diet on CBS News, Paramount+ or by downloading the free CBS News App.